The Sisters-In-Law: A Novel of Our TimeAtherton, Gertrude Franklin Horn
General
The Sisters-In-Law: A Novel of Our Time
Atherton, Gertrude Franklin Horn
France -- Fiction; San Francisco (Calif.) -- Fiction
He was also curious to see several of those "interiors" he had read so
much about, and hoped his pupils would meet in turn at their different
homes. He was a sincere and honest socialist, was Mr. Kirkpatrick, and
he had a good healthy class-consciousness and class-hatred. But he also
had a large measure of intelligent curiosity. He had never expected to
have the opportunity to gratify it in respect to "bourgeois" inner
circles, and when it came he had only hesitated long enough to search
his soul and assure himself that he was in no danger of growing
compliant and soft. Moreover he might possibly make converts, and in
any case it was not a bad way, society being still what it was, of
turning an honest penny.
But in this the first lesson he was as disconcerted as a socialist
serene in his faith could be.
The three girls had curved their slender bodies forward, resting one
elbow on a knee. At the end of each of these feline arches was a pair
of fixed and glowing eyes. No doubt there were faces also, but he was
only vaguely aware of three white disks from which flowed forth lambent
streams of concentrated light. They looked like three little
sea-monsters, slim, flexible, malignant, ready to spring.
He exaggerated in his embarrassment, but he was not so very far wrong.
"The little devils!" he thought in his righteous wrath. "I'll teach
'em, all right."
As it was necessary to break the farcical silence he said in a voice
too loud for the small library. "Well, what is it about socialism that
you don't just know? Mrs. Dwight told me you had read some."
"There is one thing I want to say before we begin," said Aileen in her
high light impertinent voice, "and that is that if there is one thing
that makes us more angry than another it is to be called _bourgeois_."
"And ain't you?"
"We are not. I suppose your Marx didn't know the difference, although
he is said to have married well, but _bourgeois_ for centuries in
Europe had meant middle-class. Just that and nothing more. Marx had no
right to pervert an honest historic old word into something so
different and so obnoxious."
"To Marx all capitalists were in the same class. I suppose what you
mean is that you society folks call yourselves aristocrats, even when
you have less capital than some of them that can't get in."
"Sure thing. Take it from me."
He gazed at her astounded, and once more had recourse to his rather
heavy sarcasm.
"Even when they use slang."
"Oh, we're never afraid to--like lots of the middle-class--bourgeois.
Too sure of ourselves to care a hang what any one thinks of us."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account