The slave trade : $b Slavery and colorJervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
History
The slave trade : $b Slavery and color
Jervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
African Americans; Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- United States; United States -- Race relations
But no class has any monopoly of selfishness and while it was most
unfortunate for South Carolina, yet it was in accordance with human
nature, that one of the first considerations of the class which had
seized the reins of power in South Carolina in 1890, was to benefit
its own class, by an attempt to perpetuate those very conditions which
for eighty years had done more to injure South Carolina than any one
thing in her history, and which her wisest sons had unavailingly
opposed, viz., the retention of a mass of ignorant, agricultural
laborers, reduced as close to the condition of serfs of the soil as it
was possible in each period to accomplish; for this is what the law,
enacted in most of the cotton States at that date, did in fact bring
about, by taxing out of existence those agencies which might have
relieved the State of considerable numbers of Negroes.
The South Carolina Act, passed December 4, 1891, can stand as typical
of this legislation, which was based upon the determination of the
white agriculturists of the Lower South, constituting as they did about
seventy per cent of the white population, to hobble, well within their
reach, cheap Negro labor. Coupled as the passage of such legislation
was with the fierce declarations against black brutes, with which
the perpetrators of such sought to excuse the numerous lynchings of
this period, it was apparent that, while the vengeance was swift in
overtaking the blacks who violated white women, the pound of cure was
preferred to the ounce of prevention; and so, exposing their women to
that risk which seemed inevitable with the tremendous Negro population
which abounded in the South, the men who made the laws still clung to
cheap Negro labor. It is true that as a whole, in the section covered
even by South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi, the white
population had gained upon the Negro population and was at this date
but slightly inferior in numbers, amounting to 2,917,000 whites, to
2,966,000 Negroes, in this black belt; but just what proportion of
whites were absolutely independent of the Negro agricultural laborer
it would be difficult to estimate. That there were then and are now
a very great number, who would profit to a very great degree by an
assisted emigration of Negroes, and that these whites were of the class
whose women folk necessarily were most exposed to the risk which a
juxtaposition of such an immense mass of Negroes presented, growing
race prejudice prevented the perception of, and the members of this
class lent their influence to this injurious legislation formulated as
follows:
“No person shall carry on the business of emigrant agent in the State
without first having obtained a license therefor from the State
Treasurer.
Section 2. That the term ‘emigrant agent’, as contemplated in the Act,
shall be construed to mean any person engaged in hiring laborers or
soliciting emigrants in the State to be employed beyond the limits of
the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account