The slave trade : $b Slavery and colorJervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
History
The slave trade : $b Slavery and color
Jervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
African Americans; Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- United States; United States -- Race relations
“That nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent emigrant
agents operating in this State between the 1st day of July and the
31st day of December of any year.”[238]
This amendment, permitting the opportunity for assisted removal of the
Negroes during that half of the year when such was least liable to
interfere with their contracts for labor, admitted of a gradual removal
of numbers of them and was a concession to public opinion and political
morality by those who, with their votes and influence, controlled the
political situation.
By 1890, it was scarcely to be doubted, that a great change in
sentiment was taking place in the world or rather in those three great
countries which, from their position, were most able to effect the
opinion of the world. In Great Britain, the United States of America
and Germany the extravagantly liberal and humanitarian ideas, with
regard to the race question, which had marked the twenty-five years
preceding 1890, were giving way to something which might be described
by the word race-imperialism. In Germany it made its appearance in many
forms, but more noticeably in the colonial ventures, which off the
coast of East Africa were smeared with a recrudescence of the slave
trade.[239] How it grew in that country and to what astounding lengths
of caste culture it proceeded, would be beyond the scope of this study,
but it might be mentioned that, by Paul Rohrback, without any credit to
the author, Calhoun’s black “substratum” theory was openly avowed as
the basis of colonial expansion.
Great Britain, with the Jameson raid and its _sequellae_, gave an
illustration of race intolerance that shocked the world, but avoided
the use of the black in conquering the white.
In the United States it took shape in the various constitutional
conventions in Southern States, aiming to disfranchise the bulk of the
Negro vote.
It was England, however, that altered the designation of “The Brother
in Black” to “The White Man’s Burden.”
In every way in 1890 the Negro seemed to have failed. His profligacy
was exaggerated, but in his profligacy he had betrayed Judge Tourgee. A
study of the Census of 1890 by the author of this work indicated that
in a total population of 62,620,000 in the United States, 45,770,000
were native whites; 9,240,000 were foreign born whites; 6,339,000 were
Negroes; 1,131,000 were mulattoes; 110,000 were Mongolians and 58,000
civilized Indians.
Comparing the two sections: There were a little more than twice as
many native born whites in the North and West as in the South. There
were about twelve times as many foreign born whites and about seven
times as many civilized Indians with fifty times as many Mongolians,
but there were only one-twelfth as many Negroes and one-fifth as many
mulattoes.[240]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account