The slave trade : $b Slavery and colorJervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
History
The slave trade : $b Slavery and color
Jervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
African Americans; Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- United States; United States -- Race relations
Of the author of—“The American Negro; What he was; What he is; and What
he may become,” Professor Hart, in his own strong book, only says,
first:
“He has made admissions with regard to the moral qualities of
his fellow Negroes which have been widely taken up and quoted by
anti-Negro writers.”[258]
Second:
“Thomas, himself a Negro, asserts that the sexual impulse constitutes
the main incitement of the race, and is the chief hindrance to its
social uplifting.”[259]
In these two temperate utterances, as put, Professor Hart conveys what
might be understood as disapproval; yet it can be urged in defense
of Thomas’ criticism of his race in the last particular, that it is
paralleled by the assertion of Professor Lombroso, himself an Italian,
concerning Italians, when contrasting them with the English; while,
with regard to the first, it would be difficult to find a paragraph
framed by Thomas more suited for quotation by anti-Negro writers, than
the following in Professor Hart’s book:
“The Negro preachers are universally believed to be the worst of their
kind, and very often are. If things that are regularly told by the
white people and sometimes admitted by the colored, are true, the
majority of the Southern Negroes, rural and urban are in a horrible
state both physically and morally.”[260]
Yet whatever the Negro preachers may have been, there is good reason to
believe that, in the cities, their moral tone is improving, and there,
now, high exemplars of morality can be found.
Again, despite his apparent pessimism, the future holds for Thomas a
hope denied to not a few, who are impatient of his probe. Where can be
found anything rising higher in optimism that the following:
“We believe American Christianity has in the person of the Negro, an
unmeasured wealth of latent spiritual energy which will be aroused and
consecrated, when the notion of sacerdotalism is scattered from before
his clouded vision, when transmitted ethnic fetichism is eradicated
from his religion and the virility of his nature, bared of empty forms
of righteousness, is breathed upon by the spirit of God, himself.”[261]
The truth concerning this matter is, that Thomas had gone too deeply
into it to be readily understood by those who have not had their powers
of perception quickened by that daily contact, which teaches so much.
Therefore, while Thomas’s book may seem extremely pessimistic; yet,
when his philosophy is boiled down, it is not very different from what
Dr. Washington is thought to have preached, that God helps him who
helps himself, or as Thomas puts it:
“Every endowment of manhood and womanhood is within the reach of every
human being, who puts integrity before material gain, and self respect
before mendacious folly.”[262]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account