The Slave Trade, Domestic and Foreign: Why It Exists, and How It May Be ExtinguishedCarey, Henry Charles
History
The Slave Trade, Domestic and Foreign: Why It Exists, and How It May Be Extinguished
Carey, Henry Charles
Labor; Slave trade; Slavery; Slavery -- United States; Tariff -- United States; Working class
"That they are not likely to effect that object; and if we do not
supply them, some one else will; but the worst of it is, according to
some people, that if the Chinese only legalized the cultivation in
their own country, they could produce it much cheaper, and our market
would be ruined. Both for their sakes and ours we must hope that it
is not so, or that they will not find it out."[103]
Need we wonder, when gentlemen find pleasure in the idea of an
increasing revenue from _forcing this trade in despite of all the
efforts of the more civilized Chinese government_, that "intemperance
increases" where the British "rule and system has been long
established?" Assuredly not. Poor governments are, as we everywhere
see, driven to encourage gambling, drunkenness, and other
immoralities, as a means of extracting revenue from their unfortunate
taxpayers; and the greater the revenue thus obtained, the poorer
become the people and the weaker the government. Need we be surprised
that that of India should be reduced to become manufacturer and
smuggler of opium, when the people are forced to exhaust the land by
sending away its raw products, and when the restraints upon the _mere
collection_ of domestic salt are so great that English salt now finds
a market in India? The following passage on this subject is worthy of
the perusal of those who desire fully to understand how it is that the
people of that country are restrained in the application of their
labour, and why it is that labour is so badly paid:--
"But those who cry out in England against the monopoly, and their
unjust exclusion from the salt trade, are egregiously mistaken. As
concerns them there is positively no monopoly, but the most absolute
free trade. And, more than this, the only effect of the present mode
of manufacture in Bengal is to give them a market which they would
never otherwise have. A government manufacture of salt is doubtless
more expensive than a private manufacture; but the result of this,
and of the equality of duty on bad and good salt, is, that fine
English salt now more or less finds a market in India; whereas, were
the salt duty and all government interference discontinued to-morrow,
the cheap Bengal salt would be sold at such a rate that not a
pound of English or any other foreign salt could be brought into the
market."[104]
Nevertheless, the system is regarded as one of perfect free trade!
Notwithstanding all these efforts at maintaining the revenue, the debt
has increased the last twelve years no less than £15,000,000, or
seventy-two millions of dollars; and yet the government is absolute
proprietor of all the land of India, and enjoys so large a portion of
the beneficial interest in it, that private property therein is
reduced to a sum absolutely insignificant, as will now be shown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account