The Slave Trade, Domestic and Foreign: Why It Exists, and How It May Be ExtinguishedCarey, Henry Charles
History
The Slave Trade, Domestic and Foreign: Why It Exists, and How It May Be Extinguished
Carey, Henry Charles
Labor; Slave trade; Slavery; Slavery -- United States; Tariff -- United States; Working class
"In the year 1829, while I held the civil charge of the district of
Jubbulpore, in this valley of the Nerbudda, I caused an estimate to
be made of the public works of ornament and utility it contained. The
population of the district at that time amounted to five hundred
thousand souls, distributed among four thousand and fifty-three
occupied towns, villages, and hamlets. There were one thousand
villages more which had formerly been occupied, but were then
deserted. There were two thousand two hundred and eighty-eight tanks,
two hundred and nine bowlies, or large wells, with flights of steps
extending from the top down to the water when in its lowest stage;
fifteen hundred and sixty wells lined with brick and stone, cemented
with lime, but without stairs; three hundred and sixty Hindoo
temples, and twenty-two Mohammedan mosques. The estimated cost of
these works in grain at the present price, that is the quantity that
would have been consumed, had the labour been paid in kind at the
present ordinary rate, was eighty-six lacks, sixty-six thousand and
forty-three rupees (86,66,043,) £866,604 sterling.
"The labourer was estimated to be paid at the rate of about two-thirds
the quantity of corn he would get in England if paid in kind,
and corn sells here at about one-third the price it fetches in
average seasons in England. In Europe, therefore, these works,
supposing the labour equally efficient, would have cost at least four
times the sum here estimated; and such works formed by private
individuals for the public good, without any view whatever to return
in profits, indicates a very high degree of _public spirit_.
"The whole annual rent of the lands of this district amounts to about
six hundred and fifty thousand rupees a year, (£65,000 sterling,)
that is, five hundred thousand demandable by the government, and one
hundred and fifty thousand by those who hold the lands at lease
immediately under government, over and above what may be considered
as the profits of their stock as farmers. These works must,
therefore, have cost about thirteen times the amount of the annual
rent of the whole of the lands of the districts--or the whole annual
rent for above thirteen years!"--_Ibid_, vol. ii. 194.
We have here private rights in land amounting to 150,000 rupees, in a
country abounding in coal and iron ore,[112] and with a population of
half a million of people. Estimating the private interest at ten
years' purchase, it is exactly three years' purchase of the land-tax;
and it follows of course, that _the government takes every year
one-fourth of the whole value of the property_,--at which rate the
little State of New Jersey, with its half-million of inhabitants,
would pay annually above thirty millions of dollars for the support of
those who were charged with the administration of its affairs! Need we
wonder at the poverty of India when thus taxed, while deprived of all
power even to manure its land?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account