The Zoogeographical Regions into which the world is usually divided
(Palæarctic or Europo-Asiatic, Oriental or Indian, Ethiopian or African,
Australian, Nearctic or North American, Neotropical or South American)
do not lend themselves any better than the ordinary divisions of
physical geography to the study of the distribution of Snakes. Contrary
to what we find in dealing with the Tortoises, Australia does not show
any special affinity to South America, and, as in the case of the
Lizards, it must be regarded as an impoverished extension of the
Indo-Malay fauna; as with the Lizards, also, Europe and Africa hang
together, whilst Madagascar stands apart, distinguished by many negative
features and some points of agreement with South America (Boidæ). There
is a greater difference between the Snakes of Europe and those of
Eastern Asia than there is between the latter and those of North
America, whilst in Lizards a primary distinction must be made between
the Old World and the New. Southern Asia east of Persia (the Oriental
Region) is the great Ophidian centre, all the groups mentioned above,
with the exception of the Dasypeltinæ, having representatives within its
limits, and a large and very distinct family, the Uropeltidæ, being
confined to it. The Pythoninæ occur along with the Boinæ, the Viperinæ
with the Crotalinæ, and the Elapinæ are represented by varied forms, as
they are also in Africa and still more in Australia, where they form the
overwhelming majority, and in some parts, as well as in Tasmania, the
exclusive Ophidian population. The coasts of India and Malaya are also
the home of the great majority of the Hydrophiinæ. Large genera like
_Tropidonotus_, _Zamenis_, and _Coluber_, extend over the Europo-Asiatic
and North American regions, but they are equally well represented in the
Oriental. The great difference between Madagascar and Africa is, as we
have said, very striking. Madagascar possesses Boidæ generically
identical with those of South America, but otherwise only Typhlopidæ,
Colubrinæ, and Dipsadomorphinæ; whilst in the greater part of Africa the
Boinæ are replaced by the Pythoninæ, and the Glauconiidæ, Elapinæ, and
Viperinæ are generally distributed. North America agrees with Asia and
South America in its Crotalinæ, otherwise its Ophidian fauna is not very
different from that of Europe, although much richer, and South America
shares the Glauconiidæ with Africa and the Ilysiidæ with Southern Asia.
South America is rich in Colubrinæ and Dipsadomorphinæ, nearly all
generically different from those of other parts of the world, and the
Elapinæ are represented by the single genus _Elaps_, with many species,
two of which extend to the southern parts of North America.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account