The Social Direction of Evolution: An Outline of the Science of EugenicsKellicott, William E. (William Erskine)
Science
The Social Direction of Evolution: An Outline of the Science of Eugenics
Kellicott, William E. (William Erskine)
Eugenics
We cannot speak of heredity in connection with diseases to which all
are susceptible and incapable of developing immunity. The presence or
absence of such a disease is determined solely by the presence or
absence of infection. Many physical and mental defects result from
infection as the primary cause. If the infection is one to which all
exposed are susceptible and incapable of developing immunity we cannot
speak of the defect as in any way hereditary; if the infection is one
to which some are susceptible, others not, to which some can develop
immunity, others cannot, then we may speak of the defect as
hereditary. Thus certain forms of blindness or insanity are due
primarily to gonorrheal or syphilitic infection, insusceptibility to
which is rare or unknown. Such defects cannot be considered as
affording evidence of heredity though they reappear in successive
generations.
In general the subject of the heredity of immunity and susceptibility
forms one of the most important eugenic aspects of this whole subject.
In a few cases it is known that immunity or insusceptibility to
specific forms of infection is a unit character which follows
Mendelian laws in heredity. It can be added to races or subtracted
from them and pure bred immune races built up. So far this has not
been demonstrated for man. There is some circumstantial evidence that
immunity to specific forms of infection has been a great, although
hitherto neglected, factor in man's evolution, and even in the history
of his civilization and conquest. It is at once obvious that here is a
great field for the common labor of the students of heredity and of
medicine and of Eugenics.
Fig. 25 illustrates a family history of infertility. This is
apparently hereditary, but before that could be asserted definitely to
be so here or in any similar case, we should know that the infertility
were not the result of an infection to which immunity is rare or
unknown. That infertility is really hereditary in this instance is
indicated, first, by the fact that the person marked A later, by a
second marriage into fertile stock, had a large family, and second, by
the fact that the individual B and his child by marriage into fertile
stocks produced in the last generation again a large family and so
saved this whole family from extinction.
[Illustration: FIG. 25.--Family history showing infertility.
(From Whetham.)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account