The Song of Songs: Translated from the Original Hebrew, with a Commentary, Historical and Critical
Religion
The Song of Songs: Translated from the Original Hebrew, with a Commentary, Historical and Critical
Bible. Song of Solomon -- Commentaries
The flames of the Eternal. These words are exegetical of “flames of
fire;” i.e. the flames of love, though having the same energy as those
of fire, are not of the same origin; they emanate from the Eternal, the
source of all love. Whether, with Ben Asher, we read שַׁלְהָבָתְיָהּ,
conjointly, like מַאֲפָלְיָהּ, Jer. ii. 31; or with Ben Naphtali, שַׁלְהֶבָת
יָהּ, separately, which is followed by most editions, Rashi, Ibn Ezra,
and the majority of modern critics, and which is required by the
parallelism; this predicate does not state that the flames of love are
“most vehement,” but affirms that they emanate from the Eternal. יָה,
an abbreviation of יַהֲוֶה (see Kalisch on Exod. iii. 14; xi. 2; Fürst,
Lexicon, s.v.), like אֵל, Isa. xiv. 13, is the genitive of cause or
origin. Comp. ἡ ἀγάπη ἐκ τοῦ Θεοῦ ἔστι, 1 John iv. 7. שַׁלְהֵב, flame,
may either be a quadriliteral, formed from שַׁהֵב, Arabic, to burn, with
the insertion of the ל after the first radical, according to the
analogy of זַלְעַף, violent heat, (Ps. ii. 6), from the root זָעַף, to
be hot; or, which is more probable, is the Shaphel conjugation of
לָהַב, to burn. Fürst, Lexicon, s.v.; Gesen. § 55, 6; Ewald, § 122 a.
The Sept. has φλόγες αὐτῆς, שִׁלְהָבֹתֶיהָ. That the original reading of the
text was שַׁלְהֲבֹתֶיהָ שַׁלְהֲבֹת יָהּ (Ewald, Döpke, Hitzig, &c.) is purely
conjectural.
7. Floods cannot quench love. Being a flame of celestial origin no
terrestrial influence, however great, can destroy or wash it away; it
is not subjected to means resorted to for the extinction of ordinary
fires. מַיִם רַבִּים, prop. much water, i.e. a great quantity of it (Numb.
xx. 11), floods. שָׁטַף, to wash, or sweep away, Job xiv. 19; Isa.
xxviii. 17.
If one should offer all, &c. Such divine love spontaneously flows from
the heart, and cannot be purchased with money; though one offered all
his riches for it, they would be utterly despised. This affirmation,
whilst true in itself, is levelled against the king, who attempted to
gain love by flatteries and praises (vide supra, i. 11; vi. 8), but was
utterly rejected (vii. 11). אִישׁ any one, one, Gen. xiii. 16; Exod.
xvi. 29; Gesen. § 122, Rem. 2. בּוֹז, the infinitive absolute, is
employed before the finite verb יָבוּזוּ, to express intensity, Gen.
xliii. 3; 1 Sam. xx. 6; Gesen. § 131, 3 a; Ewald, § 280 b. יָבוּזוּ, the
third person plural, is used for the passive, see supra, chap. viii. 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account