The Song of Songs: Translated from the Original Hebrew, with a Commentary, Historical and Critical
Religion
The Song of Songs: Translated from the Original Hebrew, with a Commentary, Historical and Critical
Bible. Song of Solomon -- Commentaries
My head is filled with dew, &c.—The locks of hair signified, before
the congregation of the faithful, among whom true religion was now
so much deranged by new and foolish ceremonies, borrowed partly of
the Jews and Gentiles, and partly invented of their own idle
brains, that the grass is scarce more covered with drops of dew in
the night, than the Church was at that time with superstitions.
14. His hands are as gold rings, &c.—Hitherto hath the bridegroom
been set forth to the world in some special members, from Frederick
the second to Robertus Gallus by almost 100 years. The hands are
the instruments of action, and in scripture they figuratively
signify works. The gems included in the rings seem to signify the
ministers of the word, which elsewhere Christ carried as stars in
his right hand (Rev. i. 20). But these times yielded not such
splendour. These things show a change and alteration of that which
Christ would bring to pass by the labour of his ministers, as it
happened about the year 1300, which was called the first
resurrection of the dead. For now the thousand years were ended
wherein Satan was bound, and the dead raised from their graves.
Very many began now more boldly to set forth the truth, as Dante
the Florentine, Marsilius Patavinus, William Ockham, John of Gaunt,
and many others. Philip the French king despised Pope Boniface,
Lewis of Bavaria strove long time with these most humble servants
of servants for the rights of the empire. Edward of England made
show unto many how little he esteemed the pope’s authority.
His belly is as bright ivory, &c.—By the belly or bowels, bright as
ivory overlaid with sapphires, may be understood the two
Sacraments. For the word of God is open to the view of every one,
as the mouth and countenance, neither is it wont to be hid from
strangers; but the Sacraments serve only for the household, as the
bowels, which are appointed only to that body whose members they
are, but serve to no use for strangers. These things therefore as
it were, with the finger, point to those times of John Wickliff
(1370), who taught openly, that the substance of the material bread
and wine remains in the sacrament of the altar; the accidents of
bread remain not without the subject in the same Sacrament; Christ
is not really in the Sacrament, in proper presence corporally.
Berengarius spoke against this wicked error 200 years before, but
the time was not yet come wherein the hands of the bridegroom
should be seen full of rings, whence his empire wanted success.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account