England -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Fiction; Villages -- England -- Fiction; World War, 1914-1918 -- Fiction
"I be just as well as never was," she remarked, when they enquired after
her own health. "Time enough for such as me to fall sick if my Alferd
don't come back."
No further news had reached her. To Jane Mucklow, now the village
optimist, with George at home on leave for Christmas, Mrs. Yellam spoke
with some bitterness. Jane meant well; her sympathy was sincere, but how
could she, so high in Divine favour, understand? Nothing could shake
Susan's conviction that Alfred lay somewhere in France, mortally
wounded, whilst William Saint, the hypocrite and rascal, knelt among the
Communicants. To kneel with him, feeling as she did, would be, in her
opinion, an act of sacrilege. She reflected miserably that, since
confirmation, she had never missed a Christmas Celebration of the
Eucharist.
On the Monday, Hamlin came to visit her as parish priest. He had
carefully considered what he should say. The faith that burned within
this strong man had been a plant of slow growth, watered by suffering,
pruned by constant self-analysis, and yet, in its essence, the faith of
a child, a faith independent of dogma, soaring high above
technicalities, resting securely upon a belief in ultimate good. He
could not disguise from himself that the Churches--all of them--had
crippled expectation. There had been no renascence, no uplifting
movement, no real enthusiasm. Political considerations and expediencies
kept the Vatican silent when a voice, thundering as from Sinai, might
have awakened millions to a realisation of the issues at stake. The
Church of England and the Nonconformists remained almost as stagnant,
content, for the most part, with the well-oiled grooves, waiting for and
watching Temporal Power, unable or unwilling to take the lead, to speak
definitely, to act decisively. With rare exceptions, the gospel of Love
had not been authoritatively used to vanquish the gospel of Hate.
Hamlin, need it be said? was no sentimentalist. He believed with Woodrow
Wilson that Prussian militarism must be wiped out. He did not believe
with Wilson that the German nation, as a whole, could be exonerated from
blame. Available evidence justified a different conclusion. Lust for
world-dominion, regardless of consequence, animated and fortified the
Central Powers because popular opinion lay behind them, unanimous save
for a negligible minority. Non-resistance to a catastrophic policy of
aggression, so potent, so meticulously organised threatened not only
Christianity but civilisation. To turn the cheek to these smiting Huns
was an unthinkable proposition to Hamlin. Nor could he find in the New
Testament any injunction of the Master which could be twisted into a
golden rule to be applied to States and nationalities. Christ dealt with
individuals, preaching and practising the power of love as between man
and man, not as between man and mankind. No text that Hamlin could find
would justify forbearance towards a nation determined to inflict
"Shrecklichkeit" upon the human race.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account