The South American Republics, Part 2 of 2Dawson, Thomas Cleland
History
The South American Republics, Part 2 of 2
Dawson, Thomas Cleland
South America -- History
Freire permitted congress to promulgate a Constitution which in effect
recognised the aristocracy as the dominant political element, but at
heart he was a radical and an absolutist, and the document soon proved
to be only so much waste paper. He showed his anti-clerical tendencies
by refusing to come to any agreement with the Pope's representative, who
arrived in 1824 charged with the reorganisation of the Chilean
hierarchy. He summarily banished the Bishop of Santiago because of his
royalist leanings, and issued decrees confiscating Church property. In
1825 he dissolved congress and for some months ruled frankly as a
dictator. When he issued writs for a new national assembly he solemnly
promised not to interfere in the elections, but so little confidence was
felt that, outside of Santiago, no one participated and from there only
a few members were returned. Freire soon quarreled with this rump
parliament, and its dissolution was followed by political confusion in
which parties became daily more sharply defined and acrimonious. There
were "federalists," who advocated provincial assemblies; "pipiolas," who
followed the strong liberal chief, General Pinto; "o'higginistas," who
favoured the return of the former dictator; and finally the
conservatives, nicknamed "pelucones" from the perukes--pelucas in
Spanish--which old-fashioned Chilean gentlemen wore. Only the military
power and prestige of Freire, coupled with his real abilities and
resolution, prevented attempts at forcibly displacing him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account