The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
The _Gong Lum_ case was in 1927. Eleven years later the Supreme Court
dealt with a suit brought by Lloyd Gaines, a Negro, seeking admission
to the law school of the University of Missouri (305 U. S. 337). The
_Gaines_ case is important, because it sometimes is said that it
heralded in 1938 the end of “separate but equal” in 1954. It did no
such thing. The State of Missouri then had no law school for Negroes;
the practice was to pay tuition fees, out of State, for the few
Negro students seeking legal education. Other Negro college students
attended Lincoln University in St. Louis, where Missouri sought
to fulfill its obligation to provide the same general advantages
of higher education for Negroes that it provided for whites by
furnishing equal facilities in separate schools. Chief Justice
Hughes said for the court that this was a method, “_the validity
of which has been sustained by our decisions_.” He was sympathetic
to Missouri’s plan to build Lincoln University into an institution
genuinely equal to the University of Missouri at Columbia. “But
commendable as is that action, the fact remains that instruction in
law for Negroes is not now afforded by the State, either at Lincoln
University or elsewhere.” The court therefore ordered Gaines admitted
to the Missouri Law School. McReynolds dissented, with Butler joining
him. They felt Missouri’s offer to pay Gaines’ tuition in a nearby
law school of good standing would provide the student with abundant
opportunity to study law “if perchance that is the thing really
desired.” In attempting in good faith to meet the constitutionally
sanctioned requirements of separate but equal, said McReynolds, “the
State should not be unduly hampered through theorization inadequately
restrained by experience.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account