“(_d_) should this Court remand to the courts of first instance with directions to frame decrees in these cases, and if so what general directions should the decrees of this Court include and what procedures should the courts of first instance follow in arriving at the specific terms of more detailed decrees?” [23] The cases coming to us from Kansas, South Carolina, and Virginia were originally heard by three-judge District Courts convened under 28 U. S. C. §§ 2281 and 2284. These cases will accordingly be remanded to those three-judge courts. See _Briggs_ v. _Elliott_, 342 U. S. 350. [24] See _Alexander_ v. _Hillman_, 296 U. S. 222, 239. [25] See _Hecht Co._ v. _Bowles_, 321, U. S. 321, 329-330. TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE There is no section heading ‘VIII’ in Part I of the original text. Section VII is followed by section IX. There is no section heading ‘V’ in Part II of the original text. Section IV is followed by section VI. Obvious typographical errors and punctuation errors have been corrected after careful comparison with other occurrences within the text and consultation of external sources. Except for those changes noted below, all misspellings in the text, and inconsistent or archaic usage, have been retained. Pg 67: ‘a white policemen’ replaced by ‘a white policeman’. Pg 219: ‘is a stonehouse’ replaced by ‘is a storehouse’.