The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
6. A study by McGurk himself of Negro and white high school seniors
in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Again, Negroes and whites were
matched for social and economic status by pairing a white subject
with each Negro subject so that both members of a pair were identical
or equivalent for fourteen different socio-economic factors. These
students then took a test composed half of “cultural questions,” and
half of “non-cultural questions.” McGurk’s finding: “In spite of
the equivalence of socio-economic factors, 29 per cent of the Negro
subjects overlapped the average total score of the white subjects.
This is almost identical with the overlapping reported in the Alpha
and Beta tests of World War I. There is hardly any question about
the socio-economic superiority of this 1951 group of Negroes when
compared with the Negroes of World War I. Yet, relative to white
subjects, the intervening improvements in social and economic
opportunities of the Negroes had not improved their psychological
test performance at all.”
In 1953, Dr. McGurk published an additional study in the _Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology_, “On White and Negro Test Performance
and Socio-Economic Factors.” Here he reclassified the subjects of his
1951 study, in order to compare the 25 per cent of each race who
might be regarded as a “high group” and as a “low group” in terms of
socio-economic factors. Rearrangement of the data made no difference.
It became apparent that socio-economic factors had not made the
two groups equally proficient in psychological tests. “The average
score of the high Negro group was very much lower than the average
score of the whites of equivalent socio-economic status. In terms of
Negro overlap, only 18 per cent of these Negro children of excellent
socio-economic background obtained test scores that equalled or
exceeded the average white score.”
Assuming that the liberal social anthropologists are right in
what they say, that social and economic forces are of paramount
importance, McGurk comments, “There should have been no differences
between Negroes and whites in any of these comparisons. As it
actually turned out, the difference between Negroes and whites is
much greater when both groups are of high socio-economic status than
when the racial groups are of deprived socio-economic status.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account