The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
Now, how is one to organize a viable public school--a completely
desegregated school--under such conditions as these? If one is
the superintendent of schools in the District of Columbia, one
can cope with what Dr. Carl F. Hansen has described as “the
enormous educational problem of upgrading large numbers of
educationally handicapped children” by a variety of devices: Squads
of psychiatrists, platoons of remedial-reading instructors, a
“four-track” system, and the like. And if one spends enough money,
and has enough pupils and buildings to permit some shuffling around
among schools, and pays salaries high enough to keep some of the most
competent teachers in the country, one can accomplish a good deal.
But how many rural counties in the South, where the _total_ school
population may number only 2000 or 2500, can possibly apply the
drastic remedies found necessary in Washington?
Consider the schools of Washington, D. C. The capital is the
showcase of the nation in terms of desegregation. If genuinely
“mixed” schools are to work anywhere, they should work best in the
District of Columbia, where every factor combines to produce the
most favorable opportunity: The political climate of a Federal
administration anxious to achieve integration, the immense resources
of a lavish school budget, the cultural amenities freely available
to all children as an adjunct to learning, the absence of racial
discrimination in employment, the untypically high incomes and job
status of many Negro families. It is entirely reasonable to assume
that pupils in the Washington schools, as a group, should not be
merely average, or slightly above average; they should in fact lead
the entire country. Moreover, it seems a fair assumption that the
exodus of white families from the District has tended to leave behind
those white children who in general are less able mentally and more
nearly on the Negro’s cultural level. If Negro pupils are to show
up well anywhere, they should show up well here. The facts indicate
nothing of the kind.
The District of Columbia desegregated its schools in September
1954, following the Supreme Court’s opinion the preceding May. In
October 1955, after a year of experience with desegregation, the
Stanford Advanced Reading and Arithmetic Tests were given to some
4600 eighth-grade pupils in the Washington public schools--1600 white
pupils and 3000 Negro pupils. The findings in Washington almost
exactly paralleled the findings in Virginia: Two-thirds of the Negro
children were found to be reading at the sixth-grade level _or below_
(21 per cent of the Negro eighth-graders, indeed, were reading at the
fifth-grade level, and 22 per cent were reading at the fourth-grade
level). Only 12 per cent of the white eighth-graders were at the
sixth-grade level or below, and 54 per cent of the white pupils were
at the tenth-grade level or above.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account