The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
If there ever is to be in the South any significant degree of
desegregation in public institutions, let alone any significant
degree of integration in society as a whole, it can come effectively
in one way only: slowly, cautiously, voluntarily, “some time in
the future.” This is the doctrine of “gradualism,” and the Negro’s
professional leaders despise it. They insist, with some plausibility,
that constitutional rights are personal and immediate rights, capable
of being lost irretrievably if they are not exercised at once; and
now that new constitutional rights have been created and defined,
they ask, why is the realization of these rights coming so slowly?
“How long do you expect us to wait?” they demand. “It is almost a
hundred years since slavery now.” They do not want to be gradual;
they want to be integrated.
To these impatient appeals, the South makes a number of responses,
none of them pleasing to the militant Negro leadership. But the
responses make sense nonetheless. The answers add up to this: The
Negro is plunging forward now in a movement that is at once both
revolutionary and evolutionary. All of man’s history suggests that
while revolutionary changes may be hurried and pushed along by
processes of forced growth, the changes that result from evolution
can never be hurried at all. They will come at their own speed, and
their own speed is glacial.
In many areas, the revolution proceeds apace. William G. Carleton,
of the University of Florida at Gainesville, acknowledges “great
strides” by the Southern Negro since World War II. In 1944, Negroes
were virtually barred from participation in Southern politics. In
1960, when he reported in the _Teachers’ College Record_ that Negro
rights were making haste slowly, 1,100,000 Negroes were registered
to vote in Southern primaries and general elections. The number is
considerably higher in 1962, and the United States Civil Rights
Commission has conceded that except in a relatively few Black Belt
localities in Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and Georgia, Negroes
now are not prevented from registering or voting over most of the
South. In most areas, it is no longer the intimidation of the white
man, but far more often the indolence, indifference, and incapacity
of the Negro himself that keeps him from the polls. In some Southern
States, Negro registration has climbed to 35 or 40 per cent of the
adult Negro population; white registration, in many communities, is
seldom much more than half or two-thirds of the adult population. In
Florida, Negro registration increased from 8000 in 1944 to 160,000
in 1960. North Carolina and Virginia have witnessed gains almost
as notable. To Carleton, a “veritable revolution” is seen in the
South: “Had the mass of Southerners in 1950 been told that by 1960
there would be considerable token desegregation in the schools of
Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina, Arkansas, and Texas; even more
desegregation on city bus lines; and that segregation at lunch
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account