The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
The colonists who cast off the yoke of Great Britain did not propose
to take on a fresh yoke of their own contriving in its place. The sum
of their charges against the Crown was that George III had sought to
establish “an absolute tyranny over these States.” He had “erected a
multitude of New Offices and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass
our People and eat out their Substance.” In the formation of a new
and independent government, the founding fathers were determined to
minimize the opportunities for new tyranny to come into power. And
toward that end, they were determined that the powers of government
should be fragmented, and partitioned off, and kept securely under
leash. They feared excessive “bigness” for the best of all reasons,
that excessive bigness ought always to be feared when the liberties
of a people are at stake. They sought to provide a check here, a
balance there, a string of unequivocal prohibitions somewhere else.
They insisted always upon a reservation to the people themselves of
powers ungranted. These were the prudent goals the greatest political
minds of our country sought to achieve.
Their first handiwork, the Articles of Confederation, is too much
denounced and too little read. “This despised government,” said
Patrick Henry, defending the Confederation, “merits, in my opinion,
the highest encomium: It carried us through a long and dangerous
war; it rendered us victorious in that bloody conflict with a
powerful nation; it has secured us a territory greater than any
European monarch possesses; and shall a government which has been
thus strong and vigorous be accused of imbecility and abandoned for
want of energy?” It is popularly supposed that when the delegates
assembled at Philadelphia in 1787, they tossed the whole of the
Articles unceremoniously aside, and set out from scratch to compose
a Constitution. They did nothing of the sort. The revisions they
made were fundamental, of course, but the principles of political
power under which the United States live today are in essence the
principles embodied in the Articles of Confederation.
Here in the Articles are to be found many of the phrases, and indeed,
many of the specific provisions, that endure in the Constitution.
The genesis of the Tenth Amendment appears as the first substantive
clause in the compact: “Each State retains its sovereignty, freedom,
and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is
not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States,
in Congress assembled.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account