The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 1, December, 1835Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 1, December, 1835
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
Learning, either superficial or profound, intoxicates with vanity,
only when it is confined to a few. It is by seeing or fancying himself
wiser than those around him, that the pedant is puffed up. But now,
all the community, male and female, are proposed to be made partakers
of knowledge; and cannot be vain, of what all equally possess.
Besides--the sort of knowledge that naturally engenders conceit and
leads to error, is the _partial_ knowledge of _details_; not a
comprehensive acquaintance with _outlines_, and _general principles_.
A quack can use the lancet, and knows it to have been successfully
employed for severe contusions and excessive heat; but does not know
the _general_ fact, that under extreme exhaustion, indicated by a
suspended pulse, stimulants, and not depletives, are proper. Seeing a
man just fallen from a scaffold, or exhausted with heat and fatigue in
the harvest field--his pulse gone--the quack bleeds him, and the
patient dies. Again--a lounger at judicial trials, having picked up a
few legal doctrines and phrases--perhaps being master of a "Hening's
Justice"--conceives himself a profound jurisprudent; and besides
tiring the ears of all his acquaintance with technical pedantry, he
persuades a credulous neighbor, or plunges himself, into a long,
expensive, and ruinous law-suit. The worthy Mr. Saddletree, and Poor
Peter Peebles,[13] are masterly pictures of such a personage:
pictures, of which few experienced lawyers have not seen originals.
The storm so lately (and perhaps even yet) impending from the north,
and several other conspicuous ebullitions of fanaticism, are clearly
traceable to the perversion of a text[14] in our Declaration of
Independence and Bills of Rights, detached from its natural connexion
with kindred and qualifying truths, by minds uninstructed in the
_general principles_ of civil and political right. The mind which has
been accustomed only to a microscopic observation of one subject, or
one set of subjects, is necessarily contracted, fanatical, and
intolerant: as the wrinkled crone, who, during a long life, has never
passed the hills environing her cabin, or heard of any land besides
her own province, believes her native hamlet the choicest abode of
wisdom and goodness, and its humble church the grandest specimen of
architectural magnificence, in the world; and hears with incredulity
or horror, of distant countries, containing mountains, rivers,
climates, and cities, such as her thoughts never conceived, and people
with complexions, customs, language, and religion, different from all
that she has ever known. But the intellect, that has surveyed the
outlines and observed the relations of many various subjects (even
though not thoroughly familiar with any,) resembles the man who by
travelling, or even on a map, has traced the boundaries and marked the
relative positions of different countries. Knowing that _they exist_,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account