The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 10, September, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 10, September, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
What if the State Legislatures do not have power to punish? They have
no power to punish any official delinquences in the Senator, however
gross and palpable, or any other violation of moral duty. They have no
right, if they enjoyed the gift of divination, to prescribe the course
of the Senator by law, providing for all contingences, nor can they
order punishment by an ex post facto law, or cause punishments to be
inflicted without a regular judicial trial, for any offence, except an
immediate violation of their own order. Even if a Senator violates his
positive pledge, the Legislature cannot punish him. They appear to be
in this respect like all other constituencies, at the mercy of their
representatives. Whether he acts morally or officially wrong, they
cannot as constituents punish him. Impeachment seems to be the only
remedy provided by any constitution, for any delinquency of any
Legislator acting in his official capacity; and this being in the
hands of the body to which he belongs, is generally inefficient. It
seems to be a sufficient answer to all arguments founded upon the
incapacity of the Legislature to punish for a violation of this
particular duty, to say that it cannot punish for a violation of any
duty. Can it be hence inferred that the Senator has no duties? Unless
it can, our adversary's argument is defective. Suppose it had the
power to punish generally for what it deemed offences? Can any one
doubt that it would punish this as one of the highest? But the power
of _subsequent_ punishment, or its absence, can neither create or
extinguish a _previous_ moral or official duty.
The Judge, in my humble judgment, begs the question, when he says, “it
is left to his _option_ to obey or not”—“a right to command is at once
met and nullified by a right to refuse.” Our doctrine contends that he
has no right to refuse, but we grant that he has the physical _power_
to disobey, without the moral right. The only option which we allow
him is that of resigning or obeying. If he resigns, of course, in
ceasing to be our representative or servant, our commands cease to be
of any force with regard to him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account