The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 12, November, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 12, November, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
If any augury of success is to be drawn from desert, this work may
fairly be regarded as likely soon to assume a vanward place amongst
its competitors for favor with the medical world. Whether we view the
quantity or the quality of its matter—the number, variety, richness,
or power of its articles—the comprehensiveness of its plan or the
judiciousness of its arrangement—it equally strikes us as possessing
the very first degree of merit.
Each number consists of four grand divisions: I. Analytical and
Critical Reviews; II. Bibliographical Notices; III. Selections from
Foreign Journals; IV. Medical Intelligence. So wide is the scope of
each one of these divisions, and so copious its _filling up_, that a
steady reader of the Review can hardly fail to know {785} every
material step that medical science takes—every important
discovery—every valuable publication, and almost every instructive
case. Not the least commendable trait in the work, is the notice it
takes of _foreign_ medicine; the attention it bestows upon the state
of the profession and upon medical men, medical works, and medical
institutions—not only in England—not only in Great Britain—not only in
Europe—but in America, and even in Asia. It practically recognizes a
great commonwealth of knowledge, pervading the whole earth; each
province alike concerned, and alike entitled to be lighted and cheered
by the sun of science; a widespread fraternity of intellect and
benevolence, of which membership is limited to no climate or
hemisphere. Thus we see notices of the state of medicine in Spain,
Russia and Denmark; and of the medical journals now published in Great
Britain, France, Italy, Denmark, Germany, the Colonies, and America.
_En passant_, we state the number of these: in Germany 11; in Italy 5;
in Denmark 4; in the United States 8; in Rio Janeiro 1; in Kingston
(Jamaica) 1; in Calcutta 1; in France (including hebdomadal and
tri-weekly papers,) 17. In Great Britain it seems there are but _six_.
We cannot too much admire the sound sense and enlarged philanthropy
breathed in the following passage of the British Medical Review,
occurring just after it has bespoken a regular exchange with its
foreign contemporaries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account