The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 3, February, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 3, February, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
We have long learned to reverence the fine intellect of Bulwer. We
take up any production of his pen with a positive certainty that, in
reading it, the wildest passions of our nature, the most profound of
our thoughts, the brightest visions of our fancy, and the most
ennobling and lofty of our aspirations will, in due turn, be enkindled
within us. We feel sure of rising from the perusal a wiser if not a
better man. In no instance are we deceived. From the brief Tale--from
the "Monos and Daimonos" of the author--to his most ponderous and
labored novels--all is richly, and glowingly intellectual--all is
energetic, or astute, or brilliant, or profound. There _may_ be men
now living who possess the power of Bulwer--but it is quite evident
that very few have made that power so palpably manifest. Indeed we
know of _none_. Viewing him as a novelist--a point of view exceedingly
unfavorable (if we hold to the common acceptation of "the novel") for
a proper contemplation of his genius--he is unsurpassed by any writer
living or dead. Why should we hesitate to say this, feeling, as we do,
thoroughly persuaded of its truth. Scott has excelled him in _many_
points, and "The Bride of Lammormuir" is a better book than any
individual work by the author of Pelham--"Ivanhoe" is, perhaps, equal
to any. Descending to particulars, D'Israeli has a more brilliant, a
more lofty, and a more delicate (we do not say a _wilder_)
imagination. Lady Dacre has written Ellen Wareham, a more forcible
tale of Passion. In some species of wit Theodore Hook rivals, and in
broad humor our own Paulding surpasses him. The writer of "Godolphin"
equals him in energy. Banim is a better sketcher of character. Hope is
a richer colorist. Captain Trelawney is as original--Moore is as
fanciful, and Horace Smith is as learned. But who is there uniting in
one person the imagination, the passion, the humor, the energy, the
knowledge of the heart, the artist-like eye, the originality, the
fancy and the learning of Edward Lytton Bulwer? In a vivid wit--in
profundity and a Gothic massiveness of thought--in style--in a calm
certainty and definitiveness of purpose--in industry--and above all in
the power of controlling and regulating by volition his illimitable
faculties of mind, he is unequalled--he is unapproached.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account