The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 3, February, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 3, February, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
In a week's time, accordingly, we behold Paul Ulric, Esq. in a cavern
of banditti, somewhere in the neighborhood of Philadelphia!! His
doings in this cavern, as related by Mr. Mattson, we must be allowed
to consider the most laughable piece of plagiarism on record--with the
exception perhaps of something in this same book which we shall speak
of hereafter. Our author, it appears, has read Gil Blas, Pelham, and
Anne of Gierstein, and has concocted, from diverse passages in the
three, a banditti scene for his own especial use, and for the readers
of Paul Ulric. The _imitations_ (let us be courteous!) from Pelham are
not so palpable as those from the other two novels. It will be
remembered that Bulwer's hero introduces himself into a nest of London
rogues with the end of proving his friend's innocence of murder. Paul
joins a band of robbers _near Philadelphia_, for the purpose of
rescuing a mistress--the chief similarity will be found in the
circumstances of the blindfold introduction, and in the slang dialect
made use of by either novelist. The slang in Pelham is stupid
enough--but still very natural in the mouths of the cutthroats of
Cockaigne. Mr. Mattson, however, has thought proper to bring it over,
will I nill I, into Pennsylvania, and to make the pickpockets of
Yankeeland discourse in the most learned manner of nothing less than
"_flat-catching_," "_velvet_," "_dubbing up possibles_," "_shelling
out_," "_twisting French lace_," "_wakeful winkers_," "_white wool_,"
"_pig's whispers_," and "_horses' nightcaps!_"
Having introduced his adventurer _à la_ Pelham, Mr. Mattson entertains
him _à la_ Gil Blas. The hero of Santillane finds his cavern a
pleasant residence, and so does the hero of our novel. Captain Rolando
is a fine fellow, and so is Captain Elmo. In Gil Blas, the robbers
amuse themselves by reciting their adventures--so they do in Paul
Ulric. In both the Captain tells his own history first. In the one
there is a rheumatic old cook--in the other there is a rheumatic old
cook. In the one there is a porter who is the main obstacle to
escape--in the other ditto. In the one there is a lady in durance--in
the other ditto. In the one the hero determines to release the
lady--in the other ditto. In the one Gil Blas feigns illness to effect
his end, in the other Mr. Ulric feigns illness for the same object. In
the one, advantage is taken of the robbers' absence to escape--so in
the other. The cook is sick, at the time, in both.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account