The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 4, March, 1836Various
History
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 4, March, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
"_Mr. President_,--Let the bias of jurisprudence predominate, and how
is it possible, (considering it merely as extending to those impulses
which may with propriety be termed a _bias_,) how is it possible, for
a government to exist, whose object is the public good? The marble
hearted marauder might seize the throne of civil authority, and hurl
into thraldom the votaries of rational liberty. Virtue, justice and
all the nobler principles of human nature, would wither away under
the pestilential breath of political faction, and an unnerved
constitution be left to the sport of demagogue and parasite. Crash
after crash would be heard in quick succession, as the strong pillars
of the republic give way, and Despotism would shout in hellish
triumph amidst the crumbling ruins--Anarchy would wave her bloody
sceptre over the devoted land, and the blood-hounds of civil war,
would lap the crimson gore of our most worthy citizens. The shrieks
of women, and the screams of children, would be drowned amidst the
clash of swords, and the cannon's peal: and Liberty, mantling her
face from the horrid scene, would spread her golden-tinted pinions,
and wing her flight to some far distant land, never again to re-visit
our peaceful shores. In vain should we then sigh for the beatific
reign of those 'suggestions' which I am proud to acknowledge as
peculiarly and exclusively 'internal.'"
Mr. McDermot rose promptly at the call of the President, and
proceeded as follows:
"_Mr. President_,--If I listened unmoved to the very labored appeal
to the passions, which has just been made, it was not because I am
insensible to the powers of eloquence; but because I happen to be
blessed with the small measure of sense, which is necessary to
distinguish true eloquence from the wild ravings of an unbridled
imagination. Grave and solemn appeals, when ill-timed and misplaced,
are apt to excite ridicule; hence it was, that I detected myself more
than once, in open laughter, during the most pathetic parts of Mr.
Longworth's argument, if so it can be called.[1] In the midst of
'crashing pillars,' 'crumbling ruins,' 'shouting despotism,'
'screaming women,' and 'flying Liberty,' the question was perpetually
recurring to me, 'what has all this to do with the subject of
dispute?' I will not follow the example of that gentleman--It shall
be my endeavor to clear away the mist which he has thrown around the
subject, and to place it before the society, in a clear, intelligible
point of view: for I must say, that though his speech '_bears strong
marks of the pen_,' (sarcastically,) it has but few marks of sober
reflection. Some of it, I confess, is very intelligible and very
plausible; but most of it, I boldly assert, no man living can
comprehend. I mention this, for the edification of that gentleman,
(who is usually clear and forcible,) to teach him, that he is most
successful when he labors least.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account