The southern literary messenger, Vol. II., No. 7, June, 1836Various
History
The southern literary messenger, Vol. II., No. 7, June, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
There is another fault which I will here mention—not on account of any
connexion with that just noticed, but because the recollection of it
has just presented itself. It is of most fearful import, for I verily
believe it to be the foundation of most of the infidelity which
prevails among the youth of our country. I mean, the neglect of
parents to require their children to seek religious instruction by
constant attendance at places of religious worship—places where _they
themselves_, if professors of religion, deem it _their_ sacred duty to
attend. They require—nay, insist upon these children seeking
classical, scientific, and literary knowledge by attending schools and
colleges; how then can they possibly justify, or even excuse their
attendance at church, not being at least equally insisted upon. They
themselves, unless hypocrites, must deem religious knowledge far more
important than all other kinds united. To leave their children then,
at full liberty to seek or not to seek it, and to coerce them in
seeking these other kinds, is to act, not only inconsistently and
foolishly, but wickedly.
One of the greatest and most pernicious faults of all, I have reserved
for the last to be noticed. It is the utter indifference which, not
only parents and guardians but all other persons except the
instructors themselves, appear to feel for the reputation of schools
and their particular conductors, although this reputation is really a
matter of the deepest interest to the whole community. Of these
institutions and their managers, it seems in an especial manner, and
most emphatically true, that “what is every body's business is no
body's business.” Slander and its effects may certainly be called
_every body's business_, since all are exposed to it; yet no
individual appears to think it his own, or likely to be so, until it
touches his own dear self, although one of the best modes of
protecting himself from it, most obviously is—to manifest, on all
occasions, a readiness to protect others. But while men remain so
prone to believe ill, rather than good, of their fellow creatures, and
are too regardless of any reputations but their own, it is hardly to
be expected, that so long as they themselves are safe, much care will
be felt whether the persons assailed, are openly or secretly attacked,
or whether they have opportunities to defend themselves or not. Hence,
there are no courts in the world that exercise a more despotic,
reckless sway, than what may justly be called _courts of defamation_;
the only qualifications for which are, a talent and love for malignant
gossipping. Even the tribunals of the inquisition make a pretence at
justice, by calling the accused before them; but the self-constituted
inquisitors of reputation, who often, in the course of their various
sessions, sit upon schools and their conductors, disdain to use even
the mockery of a trial. With them, to try, to condemn, and to execute
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account