“All that,” replied Mr. Merton, “would be very conclusive, if the facts
or phenomena did not exist to give it a flat denial. Here are the facts,
and whatever origin you assign them, they remain, in themselves
considered, the same. You assign insanity as their origin. Be it so. But
would a God who is love, who is wisdom, who is omnipotence, suffer his
children to be afflicted with so grievous a disease as insanity, one so
terrible and so humiliating in its effects? Insanity must be subject to
his dominion; and why then does he suffer any one to become insane?”
“Many of these facts, as you call them, are the result of mere jugglery
and sheer imposture,” answered the Doctor, “and do not deserve a
moment’s consideration.”
“Be it so,” replied Mr. Merton. “But how can God permit such jugglery
and imposture?”
“They are the works of man, and the results of evil passions,” promptly
replied Dr. Corning.
“Very good,” said Mr. Merton; “but whence these evil passions? and how
can God, consistently with his perfections, permit them to produce such
pernicious effects? You see, my dear Doctor, turn which way you will,
take what ground you please, your argument can always be retorted. As
far as the Divine perfection is concerned, it makes no difference, since
the facts really exist, whether you ascribe them to Satanic invasion or
to insanity, to the evil passions of man, or to the elemental forces or
inherent laws of nature; for, on any of these suppositions, you ascribe
them to a created cause, dependent on God as first cause for its very
existence, and therefore a cause that cannot operate without his
permission. The whole question resolves itself into the old question,
then, of the origin of evil. Evil certainly could not exist without the
permission of God; and yet you yourself concede that evil does exist.
How can God, consistently with his perfections, permit it? This is the
question; and, if he can permit it at all, he can as well permit it when
produced by one agent, as when produced by another.”
“But that,” said Dr. Corning, “is a question for you to answer, as well
as for me.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account