In the descending development, that is, in the abnormal development, in
which we turn our backs on our Maker, who is at once our Original and
End, our Creator and our Supreme Good, and tend in the direction from
him, our soul lets go its mastery, and our body falls under the dominion
of unfree nature, enters into the series of its laws, and is exposed to
all its necessary and invincible forces. We become not merely sensual,
but, in some sense, physical men, and act under and with the great
physical agents of the universe. We become feeble and strong as the
lightning whose bolt rends the oak, and is turned aside by a silken
thread. Now to this abnormal development, mesmerism, in my judgment,
belongs; and therefore, though abnormal, it is not necessarily
preternatural. It belongs not to healthy but unhealthy nature, and its
phenomena are never exhibited except in a subject naturally or
artificially diseased. I have never known a person of vigorous
constitution and robust health mesmerized. The experiments of Baron
Reichenbach were all made on persons in ill health, for the most part on
patients under medical treatment. The seeress of Provost was sickly, and
suffering from an incurable malady; and it may be asserted as a general
rule, that no one is a _subject_ of mesmerism whose constitution,
especially the nervous constitution, is in its normal state.
I have no doubt that many of the phenomena regarded by the vulgar as the
effect of Satanic invasion, are to be explained by reference to this
abnormal development, without the supposition of any direct agency of
evil spirits. The precise limits of the power of this abnormal
development we do not know, and therefore we are always to be
exceedingly slow to assume the direct invasion of the devil to explain
this or that extraordinary phenomenon, as Mr. Merton has already
explained. The error of Mr. Cotton was in not distinguishing between
abnormal phenomena artificially produced, and the phenomena of real
demonic presence. He asked too much of us, and we gave him nothing. He
failed to command from us the respect he deserved, and I am sorry for
it. He was a worthy man in his way, and far less superstitious, and far
more philosophical than those who thought it a mark of their superiority
to ridicule him. But he is gone, and has in his own denomination left
few behind who are worthy to step into his shoes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account