The Sporting Dictionary and Rural Repository, Volume 2 (of 2): Of General Information upon Every Subject Appertaining to the Sports of the FieldTaplin, William
Science
The Sporting Dictionary and Rural Repository, Volume 2 (of 2): Of General Information upon Every Subject Appertaining to the Sports of the Field
Taplin, William
Hunting -- Dictionaries; Sports -- Dictionaries
WHIPPER-IN—is an assistant subordinate to the huntsman in every hunting
establishment, which, if upon a well-regulated scale of any magnitude,
is never considered complete with _less_ than _two_. One of these has a
shade of superiority, and is called the _first_; the other, the
_second_, whipper-in. The first, upon all and every occasion, is
considered as a second huntsman, empowered to act with his authority
upon every emergency, and at all times during temporary separation in
the chase, or unavoidable absence. Notwithstanding this delegation of
power, it is his duty to remain strictly obedient to the huntsman, and
to execute all his injunctions with the most cheerful alacrity; and
however largely he may be qualified in other respects, it is impossible
he can ever become a _good_ whipper-in, if he is in possession of a
_bad_ temper. It is absolutely indispensible that he should be a natural
philosopher in respect to patience and self-denial, as it is so
peculiarly his province to act an inferior part, unless when
circumstances occur to bring him more forward upon the canvass; the
moment which cease, he must contentedly retire again from the front, to
his former station in the background of the picture.
MR. BECKFORD, after a profusion of the most observant experience,
admitted an excellent whipper-in to be preferable to an excellent
huntsman; and as the opinion he believed was entirely new, he felt
himself in some degree called upon to explain it. He had no doubt but he
should have better sport, and kill more foxes, with a moderate huntsman,
and an excellent whipper-in, than with the best of huntsmen without such
assistance. For he considered, that, in general sporting acceptation, it
might probably be conceived, that a good huntsman might always make a
good whipper-in; not such, however, as he meant; his talent must be
_born with him_. His reasons were, that good hounds (and bad he would
not keep) oftener need the one than the other; and genius, which, in a
whipper-in, if attended by obedience, (his first distinguishing
requisite,) can be productive of no ill, is, in a huntsman, a dangerous
though a desirable quality; and if not accompanied with a large share of
prudence, blended with humility, will oftentimes retard and spoil the
sport, as well as tend materially to hurt the hounds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account