The Squirrel Hunters of Ohio; or, Glimpses of Pioneer LifeJones, N. E. (Nelson Edward)
History
The Squirrel Hunters of Ohio; or, Glimpses of Pioneer Life
Jones, N. E. (Nelson Edward)
Frontier and pioneer life -- Ohio; Ohio -- History -- 1787-1865; Ohio -- Social life and customs
Daniel Symmes, the prosecuting attorney, had come from Cincinnati,
making the fifty miles’ journey on horseback along the Indian trails,
and the court awarded twenty dollars out of the proceeds of the fines
as compensation. But when it reassembled in December following, it
decided that the payment had been illegally made, and Mr. Symmes was
required to refund it. This so discouraged the prosecuting attorney,
he decided that thereafter he would not appear in that court as
prosecutor. He was partially remunerated, however, when, a few years
later, he was promoted to the supreme bench.
The first session of the Supreme Court was hold in this old
log-cabin, on the 25th of October, 1803, the judges present being
Samuel Huntington and William Sprigg. The third judge, Jonathan Meigs,
was unable to be present, but Arthur St. Clair, of Hamilton county,
attended the sitting in all the glory of a cocked hat and other
military paraphernalia. The only business transacted by the court was
to admit Richard Thomas to the practice of law.
The descendants of pioneers cling with tenacity to the memories of
olden times, and are proud of the historic struggles made by their
ancestors to establish schools, churches, and good government in a
wilderness known only to savage life for untold ages. Although there
was little cause for litigation, it was necessary to hold the courts
of justice open, as it was to encourage schools and churches that
directed society in the enlightened paths of virtue and higher plane of
civilization.
Workers in religious denominations met with more or less encouragement,
and mapped out their fields upon a large scale for future operations.
And fathers and mothers, doctors, ministers, and lawyers worked
harmoniously together to instruct, educate, and elevate coming
generations, and many lived to witness the fruits of those exertions
with pride and satisfaction.
Colonel Charles Whittlesey, in an address before the “Northern Ohio
Historical Society,” November, 1881, says: “If our representative
men are prominent, it may be a source of honorable state pride,
for, while great men do not make a great people, they are signs of a
solid constituency. Native genius is about equally distributed in all
nations, even in barbarous ones; but it goes to waste wherever the
surroundings are not propitious....
“Cromwell was endowed with a mental capacity equal to the greatest of
men; but he would not have appeared in history if there had not been
a constituency of Round-heads, full of strength, determined upon the
overthrow of a licentious king and his nobility....
“Washington would not have been known in history if the people of
the American Colonies had not been stalwarts in every sense, who
selected him as their representative. In these colonies the process
of cross-breeding among races had then been carried further than in
England, and is now a prime factor in the strength of the United States.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account