The Stamps of CanadaPoole, Bertram W. H. (Bertram William Henry)
History
The Stamps of Canada
Poole, Bertram W. H. (Bertram William Henry)
Postage stamps -- Canada
A correspondent tells us that the surcharged provisionals were not
the first instances of the use of the scissors at Port Hood, an
envelope emanating from that office and bearing the half of the 2c
stamp, divided diagonally, having been found with the date July
27th, 1898. We do not know what the regulations are in Canada on
the subject of receiving postage in cash, but we should suppose
that if a postmaster runs out of 1c stamps, receives postage on
certain letters, in cash, and then, to save an entry in his
accounts, cuts 2c stamps in half and affixes the halves to the
letters, it would not be considered a very heinous offence, and it
would account for curiosities of this kind occasionally turning up.
But Port Hood does not seem to have been the only office in which the
scissors were used, for the following letter from the _Montreal
Philatelist_ shows that stamps were bi-sected at at least one other
office. In this instance the postmaster divided 5c stamps as well as the
3c though, apparently, he did not apply any surcharge to the
fractions:--
CROSS ROAD, COUNTRY HARBOR,
April 17th, 1900.
Dear Sir,--Your enquiry re stamps to hand. At the time you mention
the 2c postage was given us so suddenly that I was about out and
all my neighbour P. M. was also out and as I could only charge the
public 2c I could not afford to put on a 3c stamp so cut 3c and 5c
to about even the thing up and sent them along. Three or four days'
letters were mailed in this way, but I do not know where they went
to.
Yours very truly,
E. S. SWEET, Postmaster.
The same journal in referring to the Port Hood provisionals makes some
interesting comments which are worth reproduction, viz.:--
This postmaster must be a relic of the anti-confederation regime,
when such mutilations were allowed, as even an entire absence of
the required values would not warrant, under present regulations,
this antiquated process. In such cases the postmaster should
forward the money to the office on which his mail is forwarded with
a request to affix the necessary stamps; he can handstamp or write
the amount paid on each letter if desired, but that is not
necessary. As these fractional provisionals of the Port Hood P. O.
were never issued to the public, but were affixed by the postmaster
and the amount paid stamped on them, they are no more deserving of
collection as postage stamps than the hand stamp or pen mark on an
envelope would be if no stamp or portion of a stamp had been
affixed. If it is asked "Why cut up and affix the stamps then?" the
answer is the postmaster knew no better and wanted to make his cash
account correspond with the total of stamps sold and on hand. He
tried to simplify his book-keeping--nothing more--but went about it
in an antiquated and unlawful way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account