The Stark Munro Letters: Being series of twelve letters written by J. Stark Munro, M.B., to his friend and former fellow-student, Herbert Swanborough, of Lowell, Massachusetts, during the years 1881-1884Doyle, Arthur Conan
General
The Stark Munro Letters: Being series of twelve letters written by J. Stark Munro, M.B., to his friend and former fellow-student, Herbert Swanborough, of Lowell, Massachusetts, during the years 1881-1884
Doyle, Arthur Conan
Epistolary fiction
You make a mistake, however, in assuming that those who think as I
do are such a miserable minority. The whole essence of our thought is
independence and individual judgment; so that we don’t get welded into
single bodies as the churches do, and have no opportunity of testing our
own strength. There are, no doubt, all shades of opinion among us; but
if you merely include those who in their private hearts disbelieve the
doctrines usually accepted, and think that sectarian churches tend
to evil rather than good, I fancy that the figures would be rather
surprising. When I read your letter, I made a list of all those men with
whom I ever had intimate talk upon such matters. I got seventeen names,
with four orthodox. Cullingworth tried and got twelve names, with one
orthodox. From all sides, one hears that every church complains of the
absence of men in the congregations. The women predominate three to
one. Is it that women are more earnest than men? I think it is quite the
other way. But the men are following their reason, and the women their
emotion. It is the women only who keep orthodoxy alive.
No, you mustn’t be too sure of that majority of yours. Taking the
scientific, the medical, the professional classes, I question whether it
exists at all. The clergy, busy in their own limited circles, and coming
in contact only with those who agree with them, have not realised how
largely the rising generation has outgrown them. And (with exceptions
like yourself) it is not the most lax, but the BEST of the younger men,
the larger-brained and the larger-hearted, who have shaken themselves
most clear of the old theology. They cannot abide its want of charity,
it’s limitations of God’s favours, its claims for a special Providence,
its dogmatism about what seems to be false, its conflict with what we
know to be true. We KNOW that man has ascended, not descended; so what
is the value of a scheme of thought which depends upon the supposition
of his fall? We KNOW that the world was not made in six days, that the
sun could never be stopped since it was never moving, and that no man
ever lived three days in a fish; so what becomes of the inspiration of a
book which contains such statements? “Truth, though it crush me!”
There, now, you see what comes of waving the red rag! Let me make
a concession to appease you. I do believe that Christianity in its
different forms has been the very best thing for the world during all
this long barbarous epoch. Of course, it has been the best thing, else
Providence would not have permitted it. The engineer knows best what
tools to use in strengthening his own machine. But when you say that
this is the best and last tool which will be used, you are laying down
the law a little too much.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account