The Starvel Hollow tragedy : $b An Inspector French caseCrofts, Freeman Wills
General
The Starvel Hollow tragedy : $b An Inspector French case
Crofts, Freeman Wills
Detective and mystery stories; French, Joseph (Fictitious character) -- Fiction; Police -- Great Britain -- Fiction
He let his mind rest once again on Philpot’s statement. If it were
true, Roper showed up very badly. From every point of view he seemed a
thorough-paced blackguard. Though this had come out more particularly
from the doctor’s story it was fairly well-confirmed by what French
had been told at Kintilloch. Neither Sergeant MacGregor nor Dr.
Ferguson had a good word to say about the man. No one appeared to like
him, and in the end he had been dismissed from the Institute for a
fault of a particularly serious nature.
But he was a clever rascal also. French was amazed when he considered
how he had succeeded in worming himself into old Averill’s confidence.
Even making allowances for the old man’s weak-minded senility, it was
almost incredible that this shifty scoundrel should have been trusted
with a secret which Whymper would risk a murder charge rather than
reveal.
French tramped on, pondering over the matter in his careful,
painstaking way. Yes, that was the point. Misers were proverbially
suspicious, and Averill’s knowledge of Roper’s break at the Ransome
would not tend to increase his trust in him. His confidence was
certainly rather wonderful.
And then French suddenly stood stock still as an idea flashed into his
mind. Was his confidence not too wonderful to be true? Had Roper
really wormed his way thus far into old Averill’s confidence? He had
not hesitated to blackmail Philpot; had he played some similar trick
on Whymper?
As French considered the suggestion, a point which had before seemed
immaterial now took on a sinister significance. Though Averill was
represented as the moving spirit of the affair, his connection with it
had never been directly proved. Roper, and Roper alone, had appeared.
It was true that a note purporting to come from Averill had been
produced, but in the light of Philpot’s revelation of Roper’s skill as
a forger, who had written it? Was there any reason why Roper should
not have engineered the whole thing?
French reviewed the circumstances in detail. The first move was
Roper’s. He had met Whymper outside the church gate and told him that
Mr. Averill wished to see him, asking him to go out there that
evening. Secretly, mind you; no one was to know of the visit. Whymper
had accordingly gone out. But he had not seen Averill. He had seen
Roper, and Roper only. It was true that he was presented with a note
purporting to be from Averill, but had Averill written it? French
remembered that the handwriting was extremely like Averill’s, but in
the absence of any reason for suspecting its authenticity he had not
given it the careful scrutiny which he might have done. That was an
error he must repair at once, and if the shadow of a doubt was aroused
in his mind he must send the papers to the Yard for expert opinion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account