The state of the dead and the destiny of the wickedSmith, Uriah
Religion
The state of the dead and the destiny of the wicked
Smith, Uriah
Annihilationism; Death -- Biblical teaching; Intermediate state; Seventh-Day Adventists -- Doctrinal and controversial works
_There is no knowledge in sheol._ This fact is plainly stated by Solomon
through the Spirit of inspiration: “Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do,
do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge,
nor wisdom in _sheol_ whither thou goest.” Eccl. 9:4-6, 10. When man
goes in there his very thoughts perish. Ps. 146:4.
Such are the great facts concerning _sheol_, or hades, revealed to us in
the books of “Moses and the prophets.” Their statements are literal,
plain, explicit, and unequivocal. In opposition to all these, can it be
maintained that in _sheol_ and _hades_ there _is_ consciousness, wisdom,
device, knowledge, happiness, and misery, as is popularly claimed on the
authority of this record about the rich man and Lazarus? If not, and if
_sheol_ is such a place of silence, darkness, inactivity, and
unconsciousness, as they declare, can the use of such language as is
employed respecting the rich man and Lazarus in this very place be
accounted for?
CHAPTER XX.
THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS.
The previous chapter left us with the problem on our hands whether it
were better to try to overthrow all that Moses and the prophets have
written respecting _sheol_ and the condition of those who enter therein,
for the purpose of sustaining the common view of the rich man and
Lazarus, or to try to account for the use of the language used in that
narrative, in harmony with what Moses and the prophets have said
respecting that place.
In the first place, we cannot set aside what Moses and the prophets have
written; for Christ, in the very case under consideration, indorses them
and refers us to them for instruction. How, then, can we account for the
fact that the rich man is represented as conscious, intelligent, and
active, in _hades_, when Moses and the prophets have taught us that
_hades_ is a place of darkness and silence, without knowledge, wisdom,
or device? If the record of the rich man and Lazarus is a parable, the
use of such language is at once accounted for; for if it is a parable,
the language is allegorical; and in allegory, life and action are often
attributed to inanimate objects, for the sake of enforcing or
illustrating some particular truth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account