The Steam Engine Explained and Illustrated (Seventh Edition): With an Account of Its Invention and Progressive Improvement, and Its Application to Navigation and Railways; Including Also a Memoir of WattLardner, Dionysius
History
The Steam Engine Explained and Illustrated (Seventh Edition): With an Account of Its Invention and Progressive Improvement, and Its Application to Navigation and Railways; Including Also a Memoir of Watt
Lardner, Dionysius
Steam-engines; Watt, James, 1736-1819
Messrs. Maudslay and Field are accustomed to allow an evaporation
of ten gallons, or 1·6 cubic feet of water per hour, for each
nominal horse-power of the engine. They also allow about 22 square
inches of piston surface per nominal horse-power, the piston being
supposed to move at the rate of 200 feet per second.[24]
The quantity of grate surface necessary in proportion to the power
of the engine, has been equally unascertained, and engine-makers
vary in their practice from half a square foot to one square foot
per nominal horse-power.
The proportion which the magnitude of the heating surface of the
boiler, and the fire surface of the grate bears to the evaporating
power of the boiler, has not been determined by experiment, nor,
so far as we are informed, by any well-ascertained practical
results.
The estimates or rather conjectures of engine-makers, of the
evaporation necessary to produce one horse-power, vary from one to
two cubic feet of water per hour. It has been [Pg294] already
shown that the evaporation of 900 cubic inches, or little more
than half a cubic foot per hour, evolves a gross mechanical effect
representing one horse-power; from which it appears, that if the
evaporation of the boilers of steam engines were what engineers
suppose them to be, the gross mechanical power produced in them
for every nominal horse-power of the engine varies in actual
amount from the power of two to that of four horses.
The above estimates must be understood as referring to
double-acting steam engines above thirty-horse power. The
circumstances attending the performance of single-acting engines
applied to the drainage of mines, have been ascertained with much
greater precision. This has been mainly owing to a spirited system
of general inspection, which has been established in Cornwall, to
which we shall hereafter more particularly advert.
(175.) In expressing the duty of engines, it would have been
desirable that the duty of the boiler should have been separated
from that of the engine.
The duty of a boiler is estimated by the volume of water
evaporated by a given quantity of fuel, independently of the time
which such evaporation may take. The duty, therefore, will be
expressed by the number of cubic feet of water evaporated, divided
by the number of bushels of coal necessary for that evaporation,
supposing the bushel of coal to be the unit of fuel. It will be
observed that the _duty_ of an engine or boiler is entirely
distinct from, and independent of, its _power_. One boiler may be
greater than another in power to any extent, while it may be equal
to or less than it in duty. A bushel of coals may evaporate the
same number of cubic feet of water under two boilers, but may take
twice as great a time to produce such evaporation under one than
under the other. In such a case the power of one boiler will be
double that of the other, while their duty will be the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account