Among the numerous popular prejudices to which this new invention has given rise, one of the most mischievous in its effects, and most glaring in its falsehood, is the notion that carriages thus propelled are more injurious to roads than carriages drawn by horses. This error has been most clearly and successfully exposed in the evidence taken before the committee of the House of Commons upon steam carriages. It is there fully demonstrated, not only that carriages thus propelled did not wear a turnpike road more rapidly than those drawn by horses, but that, on the other hand, the wear by the feet of horses is far more rapid and destructive than any which could be produced by the wheels of carriages. Steam carriages admit of having the tires of the wheels broad, so as to act upon the road more in the manner of rollers, and thereby to give consistency and firmness to the material of which the road is composed. The driving wheels, being fully proved not to slip upon the road, do not produce any effects more injurious than the ordinary rolling wheels; consequently the wear occasioned by a steam carriage upon a road is not more than that produced by a carriage drawn by horses of an equivalent weight and the same or equal tires; but the wear produced by the pounding and digging of horses' feet in draught is many times greater than that produced by the wear of any carriage. Those who still have doubts upon this subject, if there be any such persons, will be fully satisfied by referring to the evidence which accompanies the report of the committee of the House of Commons, printed in October, 1831. In that report they will not only find demonstrative evidence that the introduction of steam carriages will materially contribute to the saving in the wear of turnpike roads, but also that the practicability of working such carriages with a great saving to the public--with great increase of speed and other conveniences to the traveller--is fully established. The weight of machinery necessary for steam carriages is sometimes urged as an objection to their practical utility. Mr. _Gurney_ states, that, by successive improvements in the details of the machinery, the weight of his carriages, without losing any of the propelling power, may be reduced to 35 cwt., exclusive of the load and fuel and water: but thinks that it is possible to reduce the weight still further.