The Steam Engine Familiarly Explained and Illustrated: With an historical sketch of its invention and progressive improvement; its applications to navigation and railways; with plain axioms for railway speculatorsLardner, Dionysius
History
The Steam Engine Familiarly Explained and Illustrated: With an historical sketch of its invention and progressive improvement; its applications to navigation and railways; with plain axioms for railway speculators
Lardner, Dionysius
Steam-engines -- Early works to 1850
[Footnote 36: This order has, as Mr. Hall informs me, been given
without requiring any guarantee as to the performance of the engines.]
It would seem that the advantages of these boilers in the vessels of
the St. George Steam Packet Company were regarded by the directors as
sufficiently evident, since, after more than a year's experience, they
are about to place a pair of ninety-horse engines of this kind in a
new and powerful steamer called the _Hercules_.
Engines furnished with Mr. Hall's apparatus have not yet, so far as I
am informed, been tried with reference to the power exerted by the
consumption of a given quantity of fuel. The mere fact of a good
vacuum being sustained in the condenser cannot by itself be regarded
as a conclusive proof of the efficiency of the engine, without the
water or air introduced by a condensing jet. Mr. Hall, nevertheless,
uses as large an air-pump as that of an ordinary condensing engine,
and recommends even a larger one. For what purpose, it may be asked,
is such an appendage introduced? If there be nothing to be removed but
the condensed steam, a very small pump ought to be sufficient. It is
not wonderful that a good vacuum is sustained in the condenser, if the
power expended on the air-pump is employed in _pumping away
uncondensed steam_. Such a contrivance would be merely a deception,
giving an apparent but no real advantage to the engine.
Having mentioned these advantages, which are said to arise from Mr.
Hall's condenser, it is right to state that it is in fact a
reproduction of an early invention of Mr. Watt. There is in possession
of James Watt, esquire, a drawing of a condenser laid before
parliament in 1776, in which the same method of condensing without a
jet is proposed. Mr. Watt, however, finding that he could not procure
by that means so sudden or so perfect a vacuum as by injection,
abandoned it. I believe he also found that the tubes of the condenser
became furred with a deposite which impeded the process of
condensation. It would seem, however, that Mr. Hall has found means to
obviate these effects. It is right to add, that Mr. Hall, in his
specification, distinctly disclaims all claim to the method of
condensing by tubes without jet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account