The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
If in place of using an inverting telescope we invert the concavity, by
looking at its inverted image in the focus of a convex lens, it will
sometimes appear a convexity and sometimes not. In this form of the
experiment the image of the concavity, and consequently its apparent
depth, is greatly diminished, and therefore any trivial cause, such
as a preconception of the mind, or an approximation to a shadow, or a
touch of the concavity by the point of the finger, will either produce
a conversion of form or dissipate the illusion when it is produced.
In the preceding Chapter we have supposed the convexity to be high and
the concavity deep and circular, and we have supposed them also to be
shadowless, or illuminated by a _quaquaversus_ light, such as that
of the sky in the open fields. This was done in order to get rid of
all secondary causes which might interfere with and modify the normal
cause, when the concavities are shallow, and the convexities low and
have distinct shadows, or when the concavity, as in seals, has the
shape of an animal or any body which we are accustomed to see in relief.
Let us now suppose that a strong shadow is thrown upon the
concavity. In this case the normal experiment is much more perfect
and satisfactory. The illusion is complete and invariable when the
concavity is in or upon an extended surface, and it as invariably
disappears, or rather is not produced, when it is in a narrow stripe.
In the secondary forms of the experiment, the inversion of the shadow
becomes the principal cause of the illusion; but in order that the
result may be invariable, or nearly so, the concavities must be shallow
and the convexities but slightly raised. At great obliquities, however,
this cause of the conversion of form ceases to produce the illusion,
and in varying the inclination from 0° to 90° the cessation takes place
sooner with deep than with shallow cavities. The reason of this is that
the shadow of a concavity is very different at great obliquities from
the shadow of a convexity. The shadow never can emerge out of a cavity
so as to darken the surface in which the cavity is made, whereas the
shadow of a convexity soon extends beyond the outline of its base, and
finally throws a long stripe of darkness over the surface on which it
rests. Hence it is impossible to mistake a convexity for a concavity
when its shadow extends beyond its base.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account