The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
With a good achromatic prism the single-prism stereoscope is a very
fine instrument; and no advantage of any value could be gained by
using _two achromatic prisms_. In the article on New Stereoscopes,
published in the Transactions of the Royal Society of Arts for 1849,
and in the Philosophical Magazine for 1852, I have stated in a note
that _I believed_ that Mr. Wheatstone had used _two achromatic prisms_.
This, however, was a mistake, as already explained,[41] for such
an instrument was never made, and has never been named in any work
previous to 1849, when it was mentioned by myself in the note above
referred to.
[41] See Chap. i. pp. 33-36.
If we make a double prism, or join two, as shewn at P, P′ in Fig.
38, and apply it to two dissimilar figures A, B, one of which is the
reflected image of the other, so that with the left eye L and the prism
P we place the refracted image of A upon B, as seen by the right eye
R, we shall see a _raised_ cone, and if with the prism P′ we place
the image of B upon A we shall see a _hollow_ cone. If we place the
left eye L at O, behind the common base of the prism, we shall see with
one-half of the pupil the _hollow_ cone and with the other half the
_raised_ cone.
[Illustration: FIG. 38.]
6. _The Opera-Glass Stereoscope._
As the eyes themselves form a stereoscope to those who have the power
of quickly converging their axes to points nearer than the object which
they contemplate, it might have been expected that the first attempt
to make a stereoscope for those who do not possess such a power, would
have been to supply them with auxiliary eyeballs capable of combining
binocular pictures of different sizes at different distances from the
eye. This, however, has not been the case, and the stereoscope for this
purpose, which we are about to describe, is one of the latest of its
forms.
[Illustration: FIG. 39.]
[Illustration: FIG. 40.]
In Fig. 39, MN is a small inverting telescope, consisting of two
convex lenses M, N, placed at the sum of their focal distances, and
OP another of the same kind. When the two eyes, R, L, look through the
two telescopes directly at the dissimilar pictures A, B, they will see
them with perfect distinctness; but, by the slightest inclination of
the axes of the telescopes, the two images can be combined, and the
stereoscopic effect immediately produced. With the dissimilar pictures
in the diagram a _hollow_ cone is produced; but if we look at B with
the telescope M′N′, as in Fig. 40, and at A′ with O′P′, a _raised_ cone
will be seen. With the usual binocular slides containing portraits or
landscapes, the pictures are seen in relief by combining the right-eye
one with the left-eye one.
The instrument now described is nothing more than a double opera-glass,
which itself forms a good stereoscope. Owing, however, to the use of
a concave eye-glass, the field of view is very small, and therefore a
convex glass, which gives a larger field, is greatly to be preferred.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account