The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
[53] This expression has a different meaning in perspective. We
understand it to mean here the point of the sitter or object, which is
to be the centre of the picture.
A singular effect of combining pictures taken at extreme angles has
been noticed by Admiral Lageol. Having taken the portrait of one of
his friends when his eyes were directed to the object-glass of the
camera, the Admiral made him look at an object 45°! to the right,
and took a second picture. When these pictures were placed in the
stereoscope, and viewed “without ceasing, turning first to the right
and then to the left, the eyes of the portrait follow this motion as
if they were animated.”[54] This fact must have been noticed in common
stereoscopic portraits by every person who has viewed them alternately
with each eye, but it is not merely the eyes which move. The nose, and
indeed every feature, changes its place, or, to speak more correctly,
the whole figure leaps from the one binocular position into the
other. As it is unpleasant to open and shut the eyes alternately, the
same effect may be more agreeably produced in ordinary portraits by
merely intercepting the light which falls upon each picture, or by
making an opaque screen pass quickly between the eyes and the lens,
or immediately below the lens, so as to give successive vision of
the pictures with each eye, and with both. The motion of the light
reflected from the round eyeball has often a striking effect.
[54] _Cosmos_, Feb. 29, 1856, vol. viii. p. 202.
From these discussions, our readers will observe that the science, as
well as the art of binocular portraiture for the stereoscope, is in a
transition state in which it cannot long remain. The photographer who
works with a very large lens chooses an angle which gives the least
unfavourable results; his rival, with a lens of less size, chooses,
on the same principle, a different angle; and the public, who are no
judges of the result, are delighted with their pictures in relief, and
when their noses are either pulled from their face, or flattened upon
their cheek, or when an arm or a limb threatens to escape from their
articulation, they are assured that nature and not art is to blame.
We come now to consider under what circumstances the photographer may
place the lenses of his binocular camera at a greater distance than 2½
inches, or his two cameras at a greater angle than that which we have
fixed.
1. In taking family portraits for the stereoscope, the cameras must be
placed at an angle of 2° for 6 feet, when the binocular camera is not
used.
2. In taking binocular pictures of any object whatever, when we wish
to see them exactly as we do with our two eyes, we must adopt the same
method.
3. If a portrait is wanted to assist a sculptor in modelling a statue,
a great angle might be adopted, in order to shew more of the head. But
in this case the best way would be to take the correct social likeness,
and then take photographs of the head in different azimuths.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account