The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
The following general rule for taking and combining binocular pictures
is the demonstrable result of the principles explained in this chapter:—
_Supposing that the camera obscura employed to take binocular
portraits, landscapes, &c., gives perfect representations of them, the
relief picture in the stereoscope, produced by their superposition
and binocular union, will not be correct and truthful, unless the
dissimilar pictures are placed in the stereoscope at a distance from
the eyes, equal to the focal distance, real or equivalent, of the
object-glass or object-glasses of the camera, and, whatever be the size
of the pictures, they will appear, when they are so placed, of the same
apparent magnitude, and in the same relief, as when they were seen from
the object-glass of the camera by the photographer himself._
CHAPTER X.
APPLICATION OF THE STEREOSCOPE TO PAINTING.
Having explained the only true method of taking binocular portraits
which will appear in correct relief when placed in the stereoscope,
we shall proceed in this chapter to point out the application of the
stereoscope to the art of painting in all its branches. In doing this
we must not forget how much the stereoscope owes to photography, and
how much the arts of design might reasonably expect from the solar
pencil, when rightly guided, even if the stereoscope had never been
invented.
When the processes of the Daguerreotype and Talbotype, the sister arts
of Photography, were first given to the world, it was the expectation
of some, and the dread of others, that the excellence and correctness
of their delineations would cast into the shade the less truthful
representations of the portrait and the landscape painter. An invention
which supersedes animal power, or even the professional labour of man,
might have been justly hailed as a social blessing, but an art which
should supersede the efforts of genius, and interfere with the exercise
of those creative powers which represent to us what is beautiful and
sublime in nature, would, if such a thing were possible, be a social
evil.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account