The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
artists, both in portrait and in landscape, now avail themselves of
photography, both as an auxiliary and a guide in their profession; but
there are certain difficulties and imperfections in the art itself,
and so many precautions required in its right application, whether we
use its pictures single, as representations on a plane, or take them
binocularly, to be raised into relief by the stereoscope, that we must
draw from the principles of optics the only rules which can be of real
services to the arts of design.
[58] _Modern Painters_, vol. iii., Preface, pp. 11, 12.
In painting a landscape, a building, a figure, or a group of figures,
the object of the artist is to represent it on his canvas _just as
he sees it_, having previously selected the best point of view, and
marked for omission or improvement what is not beautiful, or what would
interfere with the effect of his picture as a work of high art. His
first step, therefore, is to fix upon the size of his canvas, or the
distance at which the picture is to be seen, which determines its size.
His own eye is a camera obscura, and the relation between the picture
or image on its retina is such, that if we could view it from the
centre of curvature of the retina, (the centre of visible direction,)
a distance of half an inch, it would have precisely the same apparent
magnitude as the object of which it is the image. Let us now suppose
that the artist wishes to avail himself of the picture in the camera
obscura as received either on paper or ground-glass, or of a photograph
of the scene he is to paint. He must make use of a camera whose focal
length is equal to the distance at which his picture is to be seen,
and when the picture thus taken is viewed at this distance (suppose
_two_ feet) it will, as a whole, and in all its parts, have the same
apparent magnitude as the original object. This will be understood from
Fig. 47, in which we may suppose H to be the lens of the camera, RB the
object, and H_y′_ the distance at which it is to be viewed. The size
of the picture taken with a lens at H, whose focal length is H_y′_,
will be _b′r′_, and an eye placed at H will see the picture _b′r′_
under an angle _b′_H_r′_, equal to the angle RHB, under which the real
object RB was seen by the artist from H. In like manner, a larger
picture, _byr_, taken by a camera the focal distance of whose lens at
H is H_y_, will be an accurate representation of the object RB, when
viewed from H, and of the same apparent magnitude. If either of these
pictures, _b′r′_ or _br_, are viewed from greater or less distances
than H_y′_, or H_y_, they will not be correct representations of the
object RB, either in apparent magnitude or form. That they will be of
a different apparent magnitude, greater when viewed at less distances
than H_y′_, H_y_, and less when viewed at greater distances, is too
obvious to require any illustration. That they will differ in form, or
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account