The Commission also paid a compliment to the members in general in the
mention of the fact that the absence of a written contract in the
dealings between them had in practice no evil results, and that out of
the millions of bargains transacted in the Stock Exchange, such a thing
was hardly known as a dispute as to a contract or its terms.
Moreover the Commission exonerated the Stock Exchange from the charge
that it encouraged gambling. It found that the members with whom the
purchases and sales of stocks and shares were effected were, in the
majority of cases, entirely unable at the time of executing the orders
to distinguish between those which were made speculatively and those
which were connected with investment. The Commissioners did not think it
practicable to render gambling business any more illegal than it already
was. Those who indulged in it in the Stock Exchange, the Commission
found, were mainly the younger and more necessitous members, and it
suggested that the Committee should hold a restraining hand over them,
meting out severe punishment where extravagant speculation had been
indulged in or encouraged by a member. Closely connected with this
subject was a recommendation as to the readmission of defaulters. It
appeared that during the decade preceding the Commission's inquiry, 265
members had been in default, 116 had applied for readmission, and 105
had obtained it. The Commission expressed the opinion that such a
proportion of readmissions was excessive, and that the rule of the Stock
Exchange should be against the readmission of a defaulter except in very
special circumstances, unless his default had been brought about by the
conduct of others, and not through his own fault. It was also
recommended that when a member was declared a defaulter, the fact should
be communicated to the outside world, and this is now the invariable
custom, a notice being sent to the Press for publication.
In a half-hearted kind of way the Commission also recommended that the
outside world should be admitted to the Stock Exchange, but this
recommendation has never been carried out. The Commissioners declared
that the public was able to rely upon reasonable speed and certainty in
the transaction of business, and that there was as small a difference
between the buying and the selling price of a security as could be
obtained in any other market; yet they thought that if it were possible
it would be desirable that the House should be open to the public, not
because it would give a client any real control over the deal which his
broker was carrying out for him, but because it might remove certain
jealousy and suspicion which was created in some minds by the privacy of
the House. Even in putting forth the suggestion thus mildly, the
Commission admitted that the building was hardly adequate to the
accommodation of its members, and that business might be impeded if
strangers were admitted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account