anyone possessing a sound view of nature and the origin of legends. To
make theory tally with practice, the founder of the School—following
Antisthenes, and setting an example afterwards repeated by both Jews
and Christians—maintained that Homer only in some places expressed
himself according to truth, in others according to popular opinion.
[931] Thus did Stoicism surround itself with the necessary instruments
for the most extended allegorical and dogmatic interpretation.
[(2) Interpretation of the myths respecting the gods.]
Proceeding further to enquire how this method was applied to particular
stories, the first point which attracts attention is the contrast which
they draw between Zeus and the remaining Gods. From their belief in one
divine principle everywhere at work, it followed as a corollary that
this contrast, which elsewhere in Greek mythology is only a difference
of degree, was raised to a specific and absolute difference. Zeus was
compared to other Gods as an incorruptible God to transitory divine
beings. To the Stoics, as to their predecessor Heraclitus, Zeus is the
one primary Being, who has engendered, and again absorbs into himself,
all things and all Gods. He is the universe as a unity, the primary
fire, the ether, the spirit of the world, the universal reason, the
general law or destiny. [932] All other Gods, as being parts of the
world, are only parts and manifestations of Zeus—only special names of
the one God who has many names. [933] That part of Zeus which goes over
into air is called Here (ἀήρ); and its lower strata, full of vapours,
Hades; that which becomes elementary fire is called Hephæstus; that
which becomes water, Poseidon; that which becomes earth, Demeter,
Hestia, and Rhea; lastly, that portion which remains in the upper
region is called Athene in the more restricted sense. And since,
according to the Stoics, the finer elements are the same as spirit,
Zeus is not only the soul of the universe, but Athene, Reason,
Intelligence, Providence. [934] The same Zeus appears in other respects
as Hermes, Dionysus, Hercules. [935] The Homeric story of the binding
and liberation of Zeus [936] points to the truth, already established
in Providence, that the order of the world rests on the balance of the
elements. The rise and succession of the elements is symbolised in the
hanging of Here; [937] the arrangement of the spheres of the universe,
in the golden chain by which the Olympians thought to pull down Zeus.
[938] The lameness of Hephæstus goes partly to prove the difference of
the earthly from the heavenly fire, and partly implies that earthly
fire can as little do without wood as the lame can do without a wooden
support; and if, in Homer, Hephæstus is hurled down from heaven, the
meaning of the story is, that in ancient times men lighted their fires
by lightning from heaven and the rays of the sun. [939] The connection
of Here with Zeus [940] points to the relation of the ether to the air
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account