Satisfied with the results of his own enquiries into nature, Epicurus
hoped by his view of the causes of things not only to displace the
superstitions of a polytheistic worship, but also to uproot the
prejudice in favour of Providence. Indeed, these two objects were
placed by him on exactly the same footing. So absurd did he consider
the popular notions respecting the Gods, that instead of blaming those
who attacked them, [1243] he believed it impious to acquiesce in them.
Religion being, according to Lucretius, the cause of the greatest
evils, [1244] he who displaces it to make way for rational views of
nature deserves praise as having overcome the most dangerous enemy of
mankind. All the language of Epicurus in disparagement of the art of
poetry applies in a still higher degree to the religious errors
fostered by poetry. [1245] Nor is it better with belief in Providence
than with the popular faith. This belief is also included in the
category of romance; [1246] and the doctrine of fatalism, which was the
Stoic form for the same belief, was denounced as even worse than the
popular faith. [1247] For how, asks the Epicurean, could divine
Providence have created a world in which evil abounds, in which virtue
often fares ill, whilst vice is triumphant? How could a world have been
made for the sake of man, when man can only inhabit a very small
portion of it? How could nature be intended to promote man’s well-being
when it so often imperils his life and labour, and sends him into the
world more helpless than any animal? How can we form a conception of
beings ruling over an infinite universe, and everywhere present to
administer everything in every place? [1248] What could have induced
these beings to create a world, and how and whence could they have
known how to create it, had not nature supplied them with an example?
[1249] In fine, how could God be the happy Being He must be if the
whole burden of caring for all things and all events lay upon Him, or
He were swayed to and fro together with the body of the world? [1250]
Or how could we feel any other feeling than that of fear in the
presence of such a God who troubles himself about everything? [1251]
[B. The gods according to Epicurus.]
[(1) Reasons for his belief.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account