The two remaining categories include everything which may be excluded
from the conception of a thing on the ground of being either
non-essential or accidental. In as far as such things belong to an
object taken by itself alone, they come under the category of variety
(πὼς ἔχον); but when they belong to it, because of its relation to
something else, they come under the category of variety of relation
(πρός τί πως ἔχον). Variety includes all accidental qualities, which
can be assigned to any object independently of its relation to any
other object. [202] Size, colour, place, time, action, passion,
possession, motion, state, in short, all the Aristotelian categories,
with the exception of substance, whenever they apply to an object
independently of its relation to other objects, belong to the category
of variety [203] (πὼς ἔχον). On the other hand, those features and
states which are purely relative—such as right and left, sonship and
fatherhood, &c.—come under the category of variety of relation (πρός τί
πως ἔχον); and from this category the simple notion of relation (πρὸς
τὶ) must be distinguished. Simple relation (πρὸς τὶ) is not treated as
a distinct category, since it includes not only accidental relations,
but also those essential properties (ποιὰ) which presuppose a definite
relation to something else—such as knowledge and perception. [204]
[(c) Relation of the categories to one another.]
The relation of these four categories to one another is such, that each
preceding category is included in the one next following, and receives
from it a more definite character. [205] Substance never occurs in
reality without property, but has always some definite quality to give
it a character. On the other hand, property is never met with alone,
but always in connection with some subject-matter. [206] Variety
presupposes some definite substance, and variety of relation supposes
the existence of variety. [207] It will hereafter be seen how closely
these deductions, and, indeed, the whole doctrine of the categories,
depend on the metaphysical peculiarities of the Stoic system.
[(3) Complete utterance.]
[(a) Judgment.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account