Herefrom it would appear to follow that only individual perceptions are
true, and that all general conceptions without exception must be false.
If each notion (λεκτὸν) is incorporeal, and consequently unreal, [272]
will not absence of reality in a much higher degree belong to the
notion of what is general? [(a) Individual perceptions alone true; yet
a higher truth assigned to general conceptions.] Individual notions
refer directly to perceptions, i.e. to things incorporeal; nevertheless
they indirectly refer to the things perceived, i.e. to what is
material. But general notions do not even indirectly refer to anything
corporeal; they are pure fabrications of the mind, which have nothing
real as their object. This the Stoics explicitly maintained. [273] It
was therefore a gross inconsistency to attribute notwithstanding to
these general conceptions, to which no real objects correspond, a
higher truth and certainty than belongs to the perceptions of
individual objects, but an inconsistency which the Stoic system made
not the slightest attempt to overcome.
[(b) Theory of universal intermingling.]
The materialism of the Stoics likewise led to some remarkable
assertions in the province of natural science. If the attributes of
things, the soul and even the powers of the soul, are all corporeal,
the relation of attributes to their objects, of the soul to the body,
of one body to another body, is that of mutual intermingling. [274]
Moreover, inasmuch as the essential attributes of any definite material
belong to every part of that material, and the soul resides in every
part of the body, without the soul’s being identical with the body, and
without the attributes being identical with the material to which they
belong, or with one another; it follows that one body may intermingle
with another not only by occupying the vacant spaces in that body, but
by interpenetrating all its parts, without, however, being fused into a
homogeneous mass with it. [275] This view involves not only a denial of
the impenetrability of matter, but it further supposes that a smaller
body when mingled with a greater body will extend over the whole of the
latter. It is known as the Stoic theory of universal intermingling
(κρᾶσις δι’ ὅλων), and is alike different from the ordinary view of
mechanical mixture and from that of chemical mixture. It differs from
the former in that every part of the one body is interpenetrated by
every part of the other; from the latter, because the bodies after
mixture still retain their own properties. [276] This peculiar theory,
which is one of the much debated but distinctive features of the Stoic
system, [277] cannot have been deduced from physical causes. On the
contrary, the arguments by which Chrysippus supported it prove that it
was ultimately the result of metaphysical considerations. [278] We
have, moreover, no reason to doubt it as a fact, inasmuch as the
materialistic undercurrent of the Stoic system affords the best
explanation of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account