The stone age in North America, vol. 2 of 2Moorehead, Warren K. (Warren King)
History
The stone age in North America, vol. 2 of 2
Moorehead, Warren K. (Warren King)
Indians of North America -- Antiquities; Stone age -- North America
Among our American aborigines one trait stands out prominently, and that
is the art of adapting themselves to existing and local conditions and
environments. Perhaps no race so readily appreciated that it must depend
entirely upon its own resources. We find, therefore, that it is
immaterial whether the native Americans live in Maine or in Florida, in
North Dakota, or Texas; they selected the most available materials. If
the stone was easily chipped or of such consistency that it could be
made use of, they adopted that stone for certain implements. If the
stone was refractory and not easily chipped or worked, they did the best
that they could with it. Therefore it is not always a criterion of poor
workmanship nor does it indicate low degree of culture if the implements
are crude and roughly and imperfectly made. It even means that there is
no good material at hand and that the Indians selected the best they
were able to secure and worked it out as well as they were able. Again,
in certain sections implements made of good material are to be found,
also of poor, coarse, local materials. Frequently the good material was
transported from a distance. It may have come through trade or by means
of conquest. That is immaterial. The point is that the natives naturally
preferred materials more easily worked, but that they were not always
able to obtain them. It is quite likely that few of the tribes were
friendly in prehistoric times. The natives of a given river valley may
have desired the better material to be found two or three hundred miles
distant from their habitat, but because of the hostility of the nation
living in that section where better material could be obtained, they
were unable by either trade or conquest to obtain it, and had to be
content with such unsatisfactory chert or other stone as occurred in
their immediate locality. I think that this factor entered largely into
prehistoric life.
But if no suitable stone could be obtained, the Indians made use of bone
or other substances. In several references to the Mandan village-sites
in this work, the point was made that the Mandans used the large bones
of the buffalo for a multitude of purposes. This was because suitable
stone was scarce, and for the further reason that the bones were more
easily worked and shaped than stone. In certain sections of the
Mississippi Valley where materials of all kinds were in abundance many
varieties of stone, shell, etc., were employed.
The readiness with which the native adapted himself to conditions is
shown in the house structure of the Indians. Those of cold climates
lived in very different structures from those of the South. And the
Plains Indians employed skin coverings, whereas the woods Indians made
use of bark or of logs, and the Pacific Coast Indians used quantities of
hewn boards.
This is an interesting subject, and could be followed at considerable
length did space permit.
ART IN ANCIENT TIMES AND MODERN ART
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account