The stone age in North America, vol. 2 of 2Moorehead, Warren K. (Warren King)
History
The stone age in North America, vol. 2 of 2
Moorehead, Warren K. (Warren King)
Indians of North America -- Antiquities; Stone age -- North America
Passing west to the Mississippi in Missouri we have the so-called
hematite belt. Along the Missouri River occur great quantities of iron
ore, and the natives worked this into hematite axes, celts, plummets,
etc. This region of central Missouri appears to be different from
southwestern Missouri. Central and western Missouri (outside of the
Ozarks) are also different from the cultures bordering along the
Mississippi River, or eastern Missouri.
In Kansas and Iowa we have the large notched hatchets which are peculiar
to that section of the country, the white flint of Iowa, the dark chert
of Kansas, and the minute arrow-heads, the small almost square
hand-axes, the profusion of yellow chert and poor jasper hide-scrapers.
These are always typical of the buffalo country. But the strangest
culture, it seems to me, in America is that of the cave region of the
Ozark Mountains, where Dr. Peabody and myself made several
investigations. In southwestern Missouri, northwestern Arkansas, and
Indian Territory, in both limestone and sandstone formation, are some
thirty-five or more natural caverns which had been inhabited by man. In
these are great quantities of ashes and debris. Our inspection of four
or five of these caves, the study of local collections, and an
examination of village-sites in the region revealed the fact that
chipped implements of the village-sites are of different stone from
those from the ashes in the caverns. That man in the Ozark region had no
pipes, no slate articles, no problematical forms, no roller or
bell-shaped pestles, no shell ornaments, no copper, no hematite, no
celts, no grooved axes, etc. I say none, although in the entire region
one slate article, one pipe, and two axes have been found. These may be
considered as brought in by later Indians. The chipped implements are
rough—save here and there a long, slender, well-chipped object; they are
seldom well made. There is a profusion of sandstone mano-stones and
mortars. There is every indication that the culture is extremely old and
very primitive, as stalagmites have formed (notably in Jacob’s Cavern)
over some of the human remains. This Ozark culture, as stated above, was
carefully worked out by Peabody and myself, and was found to be an
anomaly in American archæology. I am persuaded that there are other and
equally peculiar local cultures to be found if one searches diligently.
The Southern culture shows local developments. It is chiefly
distinguished by its pottery, which is different in Florida from that of
Missouri and from Louisiana. The flint implements also differ, as do
many of the types in stone. In Florida stone celts occur, but axes are
extremely rare.
In Texas there is peculiar culture, chiefly of chipped implements of a
rough sort and small minute arrow-points well made, with little or no
pottery, with almost an entire absence of problematical forms, and of
copper, little hematite, etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account