[38] In saying this, it is assumed that the interval is one which is
to be traversed by men; and that a certain relation of the shafts
and intervals to the size of the human figure is therefore
necessary. When shafts are used in the upper stories of buildings,
or on a scale which ignores all relation to the human figure, no
such relative limits exist either to slenderness or solidity.
[39] Vide the interesting discussion of this point in Mr.
Fergusson's account of the Temple of Karnak, "Principles of Beauty
in Art," p. 219.
[40] I have assumed that the strength of similar shafts of equal
height is as the squares of their diameters; which, though not
actually a correct expression, is sufficiently so for all our
present purposes.
[41] How far this condition limits the system of shaft grouping we
shall see presently. The reader must remember, that we at present
reason respecting shafts in the abstract only.
[42] The capitals being formed by the flowers, or by a
representation of the bulging out of the reeds at the top, under the
weight of the architrave.
[43] I have not been at the pains to draw the complicated piers in
this plate with absolute exactitude to the scale of each: they are
accurate enough for their purpose: those of them respecting which we
shall have farther question will be given on a much larger scale.
[44] The largest I remember support a monument in St. Zeno of
Verona; they are of red marble, some ten or twelve feet high.
[45] The effect of this last is given in Plate VI. of the folio
series.
[46] The entire development of this cross system in connexion with
the vaulting ribs, has been most clearly explained by Professor
Willis (Architecture of Mid. Ages, Chap. IV.); and I strongly
recommend every reader who is inclined to take pains in the matter,
to read that chapter. I have been contented, in my own text, to
pursue the abstract idea of shaft form.
CHAPTER IX.
THE CAPITAL.
§ I. The reader will remember that in Chap. VII. § V. it was said that
the cornice of the wall, being cut to pieces and gathered together,
formed the capital of the column. We have now to follow it in its
transformation.
We must, of course, take our simplest form or root of cornices (_a_, in
Fig. V., above). We will take X and Y there, and we must necessarily
gather them together as we did Xb and Yb in Chap. VII. Look back to the
tenth paragraph of Chap. VII., read or glance it over again, substitute
X and Y for Xb and Yb, read capital for base, and, as we said that the
capital was the hand of the pillar, while the base was its foot, read
also fingers for toes; and as you look to the plate, Fig. XII., turn it
upside down. Then _h_, in Fig. XII., becomes now your best general form
of block capital, as before of block base.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account