The Story of a Boulder; or, Gleanings from the Note-book of a Field GeologistGeikie, Archibald
Science
The Story of a Boulder; or, Gleanings from the Note-book of a Field Geologist
Geikie, Archibald
Geology; Petrology
[Footnote 46: The above descriptions of the scales and teeth of these
two fishes, are taken from specimens in my own collection. None of my
holoptychian scales show incontestable the proportion of the covered to
the exposed part. Judging from the aspect of one of them, the wrinkled
portion occupied perhaps about three-fifths of the entire scale,
the remaining part being covered by the overlapping edges of those
adjacent; for the characteristic corrugated surface was essentially
an external ornament, and ceased at the point where the external
bone passed into the interior. I may remark, that the upper side of
the scales is not very frequently seen in the Burdiehouse limestone,
the rough surface usually adhering to the rock, and leaving only the
smooth inner side exposed. Out of seven specimens from that locality,
only one shows the upper side, and that by no means in a perfect state
of keeping. The structure alike of scales and bones can be seen to
much greater advantage in the shales, ironstones, and coals of the
coal-fields, where, owing to the soft nature of their matrix, the
fossils can be readily cleared and exposed.]
But perhaps the most remarkable and characteristic parts of the
carboniferous holoptychius were its jaws and teeth. As we might
readily conjecture from the great size and strength of the scales and
cranial plates of this fish, its dentition was of a correspondingly
massive type. The under jaw, with the usual corrugated ornament,
frequently exceeded a foot in length, and displayed along its upper
edge a thick-set group of teeth. Of these there were two kinds one
of a smaller size and more blunted form, with short indented furrows
at their base; the other of a greatly more formidable size, grouped
at intervals among the smaller ones. The front end of each under jaw
bore one of these long conical tusks, serving as it were to guard the
entrance of the mouth. Each of the larger teeth had a base strongly
marked with longitudinal furrows, and sank deep into the jaw, with
the bone of which it sometimes anchylosed.[47] The part of the tooth
above this socket had an oval form, so flattened as to present two
cutting edges, one facing the front, the other the back of the mouth,
and meeting at the upper end of the tooth which was sharp and pointed.
Such large conical tusks may frequently be obtained, having a length
of two or three inches, while occasionally they range as high as six
or seven, the smaller teeth seldom reaching so much as an inch. It
is difficult to see how, with such a formidable dentition, the jaws
could readily close. In some specimens I have seen deep hollows beside
the bases of the teeth, which may possibly have received those of the
opposite jaw, but the gigantic tusks at the entrance of the mouth seem
to have stood high over the jaw, passing outside like those of the
wild-boar. If this be correct, the jaw of the holoptychius would unite
the mechanism of both the alligator and the crocodile--its recipient
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account